Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the cpuidle-cons tree with the arm-soc tree

From: Nicolas Ferre <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:05:32 +0100

On 03/09/2012 08:37 AM, Stephen Rothwell :
> Hi Rob,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the cpuidle-cons tree got a conflict
> in arch/arm/mach-at91/cpuidle.c between commit 00482a4078f4 ("ARM:
> at91: implement the standby function for pm/cpuidle") from the
> arm-soc tree and commit 7a1f6e72dce1 ("ARM: at91: Consolidate time
> keeping and irq enable") from the cpuidle-cons tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as
> necessary.

Yes: resolution correct. Please carry it.

Thanks to Rob and Daniel for their answers.

Best regards,
- -- 
Nicolas Ferre