Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the xfs tree

From: Mark Tinguely <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 13:36:14 -0500

On 05/10/12 13:32, Ben Myers wrote:

> Signed-off-by: Ben Myers<[email-masked]>
>
> Index: xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_alloc.c
> ===================================================================
> --- xfs.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_alloc.c
> +++ xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_alloc.c
> @@ -47,8 +47,6 @@ STATIC int xfs_alloc_ag_vextent_near(xfs
>   STATIC int xfs_alloc_ag_vextent_size(xfs_alloc_arg_t *);
>   STATIC int xfs_alloc_ag_vextent_small(xfs_alloc_arg_t *,
>   		xfs_btree_cur_t *, xfs_agblock_t *, xfs_extlen_t *, int *);
> -STATIC void xfs_extent_busy_trim(struct xfs_alloc_arg *,
> -		xfs_agblock_t, xfs_extlen_t, xfs_agblock_t *, xfs_extlen_t *);
>
>   /*
>    * Lookup the record equal to [bno, len] in the btree given by cur.
> Index: xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c
> ===================================================================
> --- xfs.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c
> +++ xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.c
> @@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ restart:
>    * args->minlen no suitable extent could be found, and the higher level
>    * code needs to force out the log and retry the allocation.
>    */
> -STATIC void
> +void
>   xfs_extent_busy_trim(
>   	struct xfs_alloc_arg	*args,
>   	xfs_agblock_t		bno,
> Index: xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.h
> ===================================================================
> --- xfs.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.h
> +++ xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_extent_busy.h
> @@ -54,6 +54,10 @@ void
>   xfs_extent_busy_reuse(struct xfs_mount *mp, xfs_agnumber_t agno,
>   	xfs_agblock_t fbno, xfs_extlen_t flen, bool userdata);
>
> +void
> +xfs_extent_busy_trim(struct xfs_alloc_arg *args, xfs_agblock_t bno,
> +	xfs_extlen_t len, xfs_agblock_t *rbno, xfs_extlen_t *rlen);
> +
>   int
>   xfs_extent_busy_ag_cmp(void *priv, struct list_head *a, struct list_head *b);
>
>

Hmmm, I saw that before. I have been hand patching that to test.

Looks good.

Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely <[email-masked]>