From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod•at>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat•com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp•com.au>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime•net>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>,
linux-next@vger•kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org>,
user-mode-linux-devel@lists•sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml)
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 16:31:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <502A613F.1090600@nod.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15532.1344954413@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 881 bytes --]
Am 14.08.2012 16:26, schrieb David Howells:
> Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp•com.au> wrote:
>
>>>> CC arch/x86/um/../kernel/module.o
>>>> arch/x86/um/../kernel/module.c:96:5: error: redefinition of 'apply_relocate_add'
>>>> include/linux/moduleloader.h:64:19: note: previous definition of 'apply_relocate_add' was here
>>>> make[2]: *** [arch/x86/um/../kernel/module.o] Error 1
>
> Hmmm... I'm not sure how to deal with this. The problem is that UML doesn't
> draw the:
>
> select MODULES_USE_ELF_REL if X86_32
> select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA if X86_64
>
> definitions from arch/foo/Kconfig that tell it what modules will look like.
>
> Should I just enable both REL and RELA in UML, or is there a better way to do
> this?
Is there no way to get this information from the UML subarch?
Which is currently X86_32 or X86_64.
Thanks,
//richard
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-14 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-26 5:04 linux-next: Tree for July 26 Stephen Rothwell
2012-07-26 15:18 ` linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml) Randy Dunlap
2012-08-13 17:00 ` Randy Dunlap
2012-08-14 0:13 ` Rusty Russell
2012-08-14 14:26 ` David Howells
2012-08-14 14:31 ` Richard Weinberger [this message]
2012-08-14 14:51 ` David Howells
2012-08-14 14:54 ` David Howells
2012-08-14 14:57 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-08-14 15:06 ` David Howells
2012-08-14 15:08 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-08-14 15:15 ` David Howells
2012-08-14 15:17 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-08-14 17:41 ` Randy Dunlap
2012-08-20 2:51 ` Rusty Russell
2012-08-21 17:43 ` Randy Dunlap
2012-08-22 1:17 ` Rusty Russell
2012-08-14 15:09 ` David Howells
2012-08-14 14:54 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-07-26 15:43 ` linux-next: Tree for July 26 (vfio) Randy Dunlap
2012-07-26 16:16 ` Alex Williamson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=502A613F.1090600@nod.at \
--to=richard@nod$(echo .)at \
--cc=dhowells@redhat$(echo .)com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime$(echo .)net \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp$(echo .)com.au \
--cc=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists$(echo .)sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox