Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml)

From: Randy Dunlap <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 10:43:59 -0700

On 08/19/2012 07:51 PM, Rusty Russell wrote:

> On Tue, 14 Aug 2012 10:41:42 -0700, Randy Dunlap <[email-masked]> wrote:
>> On 08/14/2012 08:17 AM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>>
>>> Am 14.08.2012 17:15, schrieb David Howells:
>>>> How about this then?
>>>>
>>>> David
>>>> ---
>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/um/Kconfig b/arch/x86/um/Kconfig
>>>> index 9926e11..a4b0c10 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/x86/um/Kconfig
>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/um/Kconfig
>>>> @@ -21,9 +21,11 @@ config 64BIT
>>>>  config X86_32
>>>>  	def_bool !64BIT
>>>>  	select HAVE_AOUT
>>>> +	select MODULES_USE_ELF_REL
>>>>  
>>>>  config X86_64
>>>>  	def_bool 64BIT
>>>> +	select MODULES_USE_ELF_RELA
>>>>  
>>>>  config RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM
>>>>  	def_bool X86_XADD && 64BIT
>>>
>>> Looks sane.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Richard Weinberger <[email-masked]>
>>
>>
>> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <[email-masked]>
> 
> Thanks, folded into David's original patch.

When will this be fixed in linux-next?

linux-next of 20120821 still fails.

thanks,
-- 
~Randy