Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for May 30

From: Nicolas Ferre <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 10:45:15 +0200

On 03/06/2013 08:36, Stephen Rothwell :
> Hi Geert,
>
> On Thu, 30 May 2013 10:07:48 +0200 Geert Uytterhoeven <[email-masked]> wrote:
>>
>> The following defconfigs fail without anything useful in the log:
>>    - at91sam9g20_defconfig
>>    - at91sam9261_defconfig
>>    - at91sam9260_defconfig
>>
>> A manual run reveals why:
>> Can't find default configuration "arch/arm/configs/at91sam9g20_defconfig"!
>>
>> This is due to the merge of several config files:
>>
>> commit b3f442b0eedbc20b5ce3f4a96530588d14901199
>> Author: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[email-masked]>
>> Date:   Wed May 15 17:19:21 2013 +0200
>>
>>      ARM: at91: udpate defconfigs
>>
>>      Merge 9g20 with 9260 and 9g10 with 9261 as those SoCs can run from the same
>>      kernel even in non DT world.
>>
>>      Fix the sam9261ek to allow 9g10 and sam9261 to compile together.
>>
>>      Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <[email-masked]>
>>      Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <[email-masked]>
>
> Thanks for letting me know.  I have stopped those three configs from
> being built.

Stephen, Geert,

Thanks for having taking care about this.

Is it possible for you to move the building to the replacement defconfigs:
at91sam9260_9g20_defconfig
at91sam9261_9g10_defconfig

Best regards,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre