Subject: Re: regression(ti platforms): next-20140210 (ehci?)

From: Nishanth Menon <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 12:02:57 -0600

On 02/10/2014 11:50 AM, Roger Quadros wrote:
> +devicetree
[...]
> In the DT node we have compatible ids for both. e.g. for omap4.dtsi
> 
>                         usbhsehci: ehci@4a064c00 {
>                                 compatible = "ti,ehci-omap", "usb-ehci";
>                                 reg = <0x4a064c00 0x400>;
>                                 interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
>                                 interrupts = <GIC_SPI 77 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>                         };
> 
> Shouldn't ehci-omap driver be getting a higher priority than usb-ehci?
> 
> A quick fix would be to eliminate "usb-ehci" from the DT node of all failing platforms.

If the driver is not compatible with "usb-ehci", not sure why do we
even state that in dts node?

-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon