Subject: Re: regression(ti platforms): next-20140210 (ehci?)

From: Roger Quadros <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 20:16:53 +0200

On 02/10/2014 08:02 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 02/10/2014 11:50 AM, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> +devicetree
>>
> [...]
>> In the DT node we have compatible ids for both. e.g. for omap4.dtsi
>>
>>                         usbhsehci: ehci@4a064c00 {
>>                                 compatible = "ti,ehci-omap", "usb-ehci";
>>                                 reg = <0x4a064c00 0x400>;
>>                                 interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
>>                                 interrupts = <GIC_SPI 77 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>>                         };
>>
>> Shouldn't ehci-omap driver be getting a higher priority than usb-ehci?
>>
>> A quick fix would be to eliminate "usb-ehci" from the DT node of all failing platforms.
> 
> If the driver is not compatible with "usb-ehci", not sure why do we
> even state that in dts node?
> 
> 
I'm not sure either. Let's get rid of it.

Patch to fix the reported issue.
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.devicetree/61204

cheers,
-roger