Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Aug 11

From: Guenter Roeck <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 18:08:26 -0700

On 08/11/2014 05:59 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
>
> On Mon, 11 Aug 2014 10:05:10 -0700 Guenter Roeck <[email-masked]> wrote:
>>
>> New build failures:
>>
>> Building arm:s5pv210_defconfig ... failed
>> --------------
>> Error log:
>> arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/pm.c:150:12: error: 'suspend_valid_only_mem' undeclared
>> here (not in a function)
>> make[1]: *** [arch/arm/mach-s5pv210/pm.o] Error 1
>>
>> Building arm:pxa910_defconfig ... failed
>> --------------
>> Error log:
>> arch/arm/mach-mmp/pm-pxa910.c: In function 'pxa910_pm_valid':
>> arch/arm/mach-mmp/pm-pxa910.c:243:65: error: expected ')' before ';' token
>> arch/arm/mach-mmp/pm-pxa910.c:244:1: error: expected ';' before '}' token
>> make[1]: *** [arch/arm/mach-mmp/pm-pxa910.o] Error 1
>
> The patch that caused this has been removed from linux-next.
>

Great.

Wonder if we should send notifications like that on a regular basis. The summaries
and build results are all available on http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/linux-next,
and now on my test results page as well, but judging from the errors moving from
-next into mainline, hardly anyone seems to care and/or notice.

Guenter