From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel•org>
To: James Clark <james.clark@linaro•org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail•com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel•org>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm•com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger•kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the perf tree
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 17:02:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6a8bd632-31ab-4458-8367-bbde59f8f1dd@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f4c1f996-57b8-46a9-9014-10e818ad0832@linaro.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 845 bytes --]
On Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 04:55:31PM +0000, James Clark wrote:
> On 19/01/2026 4:43 pm, Mark Brown wrote:
> > No, all the -next builds are done incrementally so the working tree will
> > start with whatever the last commit that got built was. This would also
> > break bisection cases...
> Oh I see, that's an out of source build path not actually in the repo.
Yeah, all the -next builds are out of tree builds (he says grumpily
looking at the kselftest coverage he just enabled :/) - the source tree
is kept clean.
> That is a problem then, will take a look. I'm not sure why those files are
> even copied out of the tree. It would make sense if they're generated, but
> those ones specifically are not.
> Seems like the build will need to be fixed to either handle deleted files or
> just not copy them in the first place.
Great, thanks.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-19 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-19 16:09 linux-next: build failure after merge of the perf tree Mark Brown
2026-01-19 16:37 ` James Clark
2026-01-19 16:43 ` Mark Brown
2026-01-19 16:55 ` James Clark
2026-01-19 17:02 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2026-01-26 15:13 ` Mark Brown
2026-01-26 15:20 ` James Clark
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-03-26 23:22 Stephen Rothwell
2025-03-28 6:40 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-02-14 4:20 Stephen Rothwell
2025-01-09 23:05 Stephen Rothwell
2025-01-09 23:31 ` Charlie Jenkins
2025-01-10 14:01 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2025-01-10 17:32 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2025-01-10 18:59 ` Charlie Jenkins
2025-01-10 19:22 ` Charlie Jenkins
2024-10-10 23:23 Stephen Rothwell
2024-09-05 1:55 Stephen Rothwell
2024-04-01 22:41 Stephen Rothwell
2024-04-02 20:17 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-04-12 15:22 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-04-13 2:43 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-21 21:41 Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-21 23:18 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-03-21 23:19 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-03-21 23:32 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-22 2:13 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-22 14:32 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-03-21 23:36 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-21 23:40 ` arnaldo.melo
2024-03-21 23:48 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-02-21 23:06 Stephen Rothwell
2024-02-23 19:50 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2024-02-06 23:40 Stephen Rothwell
2024-02-07 0:02 ` Ian Rogers
2023-10-24 23:26 Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-25 0:34 ` Namhyung Kim
2023-05-29 23:05 Stephen Rothwell
2023-05-30 2:16 ` Ian Rogers
2023-03-16 22:50 Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-16 23:11 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-03-16 23:55 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-17 3:23 ` Ian Rogers
2023-03-21 21:39 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-22 18:37 ` Ian Rogers
2023-03-22 22:54 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-23 13:27 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-03-27 20:31 ` Ian Rogers
2023-03-28 1:33 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-28 19:47 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-03-28 23:06 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-03-29 12:28 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-04-03 5:15 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-08-30 22:34 Stephen Rothwell
2022-09-01 5:11 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-06 19:05 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-09-07 2:31 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-07 3:00 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-09-07 4:22 ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-08 15:21 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-07-20 23:05 Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-21 2:35 ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-21 3:55 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-21 5:33 ` Ian Rogers
2022-01-05 22:19 Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-07 8:58 ` kajoljain
2022-01-11 21:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-11 22:01 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2022-01-12 5:30 ` kajoljain
2022-01-12 6:16 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-14 12:03 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6a8bd632-31ab-4458-8367-bbde59f8f1dd@sirena.org.uk \
--to=broonie@kernel$(echo .)org \
--cc=arnaldo.melo@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=james.clark@linaro$(echo .)org \
--cc=leo.yan@arm$(echo .)com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel$(echo .)org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox