Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the arm-soc tree

From: Sören Brinkmann <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 09:41:18 -0700

On Mon, 2014-03-17 at 04:35PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/mach-zynq/Kconfig between commit ddb902cc3459 ("ARM: centralize
> common multi-platform kconfig options") from the arm-soc tree and commit
> cd325295871f ("arm: zynq: Add support for cpufreq") from the tip tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> is required).
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell                    [email-masked]
> 
> diff --cc arch/arm/mach-zynq/Kconfig
> index 105d39b72a25,f03e75bd0b2b..000000000000
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-zynq/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-zynq/Kconfig
> @@@ -2,10 -2,19 +2,12 @@@ config ARCH_ZYN
>   	bool "Xilinx Zynq ARM Cortex A9 Platform" if ARCH_MULTI_V7
>   	select ARM_AMBA
>   	select ARM_GIC
> + 	select ARCH_HAS_CPUFREQ
> + 	select ARCH_HAS_OPP
>  -	select COMMON_CLK
>  -	select CPU_V7
>  -	select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
>   	select HAVE_ARM_SCU if SMP
>   	select HAVE_ARM_TWD if SMP
>   	select ICST
>  -	select MIGHT_HAVE_CACHE_L2X0

The two conflicting patches mentioned above don't touch this line, I
think. I'm not sure whether this should go away.
Apart from this, things look okay to me.

	Thanks,
	Sören

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
[email-masked]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel