Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xilinx tree with the ti tree

From: Michal Simek <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 16:17:46 +0100

Hi Mark, +Arnd

On 1/19/26 16:14, Mark Brown wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the xilinx tree got a conflict in:
> 
>    arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> 
> between commit:
> 
>    f69f88211c84d ("arm64: defconfig: Enable the J721E PCI host driver")
> 
> from the ti tree and commit:
> 
>    41de0de8033e7 ("arm64: defconfig: Enable missing AMD/Xilinx drivers")
> 
> from the xilinx tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> diff --cc arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> index c46c678c8f6c2,cdb7d69e3b248..0000000000000
> --- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
> @@@ -233,10 -231,12 +233,14 @@@ CONFIG_PCIE_MEDIATEK_GEN3=
>    CONFIG_PCI_TEGRA=y
>    CONFIG_PCIE_RCAR_HOST=y
>    CONFIG_PCIE_RCAR_EP=y
>   +CONFIG_PCIE_RENESAS_RZG3S_HOST=y
>    CONFIG_PCIE_ROCKCHIP_HOST=m
>    CONFIG_PCI_XGENE=y
>   +CONFIG_PCI_J721E_HOST=m
> + CONFIG_PCIE_XILINX=y
> + CONFIG_PCIE_XILINX_DMA_PL=y
> + CONFIG_PCIE_XILINX_NWL=y
> + CONFIG_PCIE_XILINX_CPM=y
>    CONFIG_PCI_IMX6_HOST=y
>    CONFIG_PCI_LAYERSCAPE=y
>    CONFIG_PCI_HISI=y
> @@@ -608,11 -609,11 +618,13 @@@ CONFIG_SPI_STM32_OSPI=
>    CONFIG_SPI_SUN6I=y
>    CONFIG_SPI_TEGRA210_QUAD=m
>    CONFIG_SPI_TEGRA114=m
> + CONFIG_SPI_XILINX=m
> + CONFIG_SPI_ZYNQMP_GQSPI=m
>    CONFIG_SPI_SPIDEV=m
>    CONFIG_SPMI=y
>   +CONFIG_SPMI_APPLE=m
>    CONFIG_SPMI_MTK_PMIF=m
>   +CONFIG_PINCTRL_APPLE_GPIO=m
>    CONFIG_PINCTRL_BRCMSTB=y
>    CONFIG_PINCTRL_BCM2712=y
>    CONFIG_PINCTRL_DA9062=m

I have sent merge request to Arnd today. My 2 patches are in Linux-next for a 
while that's why it is new change coming from that second tree.

https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-soc/patch/[email-masked]/

Arnd: please be aware.

Thanks,
Michal