public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel•org>
To: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux•dev>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation•org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger•kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the origin tree
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2024 13:00:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <75e2514c-7647-4d3b-9c55-c6e5c615c92e@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <i75zg7tnd4jvelfx6qb2pc72h45kki4vfku7qwghauztgcoywe@htrp3xhyz4u2>

On 30/09/2024 12:50, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 12:28:40PM GMT, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 30/09/2024 05:38, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> After merging the origin tree, today's linux-next build (s390
>>> defconfig) failed like this:
>>> 
>>> In file included from fs/bcachefs/bset.h:9, from
>>> fs/bcachefs/btree_iter.h:5, from fs/bcachefs/str_hash.h:5, from
>>> fs/bcachefs/xattr.h:5, from fs/bcachefs/acl.c:6: 
>>> fs/bcachefs/bkey.h: In function 'bch2_bkey_format_add_key': 
>>> fs/bcachefs/bkey.h:557:41: error: 'const struct bkey' has no
>>> member named 'bversion'; did you mean 'version'? 557 |
>>> x(BKEY_FIELD_VERSION_HI,        bversion.hi)
>>> \ |                                         ^~~~~~~~
>> 
>> 
>> Also reported earlier here: 
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/202409272048.MZvBm569-lkp@intel.com/ 
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/202409271712.EZRpO2Z1-lkp@intel.com/
>> 
>> But the true problem is here:
>> 
>> commit cf49f8a8c277f9f2b78e2a56189a741a508a9820 Author:     Kent
>> Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux•dev> AuthorDate: Thu Sep 26
>> 15:49:17 2024 -0400 ^^^^^^^^^^^ Commit:     Kent Overstreet
>> <kent.overstreet@linux•dev> CommitDate: Fri Sep 27 21:46:35 2024
>> -0400 ^^^^^^^^^^^ one day difference!
>> 
>> Last minute commits usually won't receive wide build coverage, at
>> least not instantaneously.
>> 
>> And if you go through the history, I see around 40 commits with
>> authored date ~20-26 September and committed on Sep 27. Plus
>> another ~40 authored earlier but committed on September 21, which
>> is middle of merge window.
>> 
>> Why such commits for RC1 are sent at the end of merge window or 
>> committed during merge window?
> 
> the rename was something I did to track down a bug in the disk
> accounting rewrite: 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-bcachefs/pvga5sgp4vejnnr5ojgiuwte6qeve4x7ld4dhdmzb625l367fq@q4td2cutlfvu/T/

I am sorry, but I do not see how cleanup-like rename is related to
tracking down a tricky bug and fixing it. Looks like fixes got
inter-mixed with such minor refactoring.

>
>  I do need to get multi-arch build testing going on my CI, but right
> now I'm busy working on corner cases in the repair code...

Well, I claim it is easy, if you wait one day for the notification from
LKP - I got notification after every push, also on success, so I am sure
that my kernel (and development, but that's unrelated) builds fine on
wide configuration. And this is free as in free beer...

Best regards,
Krzysztof

  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-30 11:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-30  3:38 linux-next: build failure after merge of the origin tree Stephen Rothwell
2024-09-30 10:28 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-09-30 10:50   ` Kent Overstreet
2024-09-30 11:00     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-05-28 12:43 Mark Brown
2026-05-28 13:23 ` Miguel Ojeda
2026-05-28 13:26   ` Mark Brown
2024-12-18  4:13 Stephen Rothwell
2024-12-18  8:03 ` Jürgen Groß
2023-06-30  2:59 Stephen Rothwell
2023-06-30  3:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-09-19 23:42 Stephen Rothwell
2021-09-14  0:08 Stephen Rothwell
2021-09-14  0:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2021-09-14  0:24   ` Linus Torvalds
2021-09-14  0:58     ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-09-14  1:29       ` Linus Torvalds
2021-09-14  1:37         ` Linus Torvalds
2021-09-14  2:03           ` Linus Torvalds
2021-09-14  2:08         ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-09-14  2:12           ` Linus Torvalds
2021-09-14  2:50             ` Michael Ellerman
2021-09-14 12:21             ` Michael Ellerman
2021-09-14  2:39           ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-09-07 23:07 Stephen Rothwell
2021-09-07 23:09 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-09-07 23:17   ` Marco Elver
2021-09-07 23:38     ` Miguel Ojeda
2020-07-30 22:58 Stephen Rothwell
2020-07-30 23:15 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-07-29 23:08 Stephen Rothwell
2020-07-29 23:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-07-30  0:09   ` Linus Torvalds
2020-07-30  2:12     ` Linus Torvalds
2020-07-30  2:30       ` Willy Tarreau
2020-07-30  3:17   ` Kees Cook
2020-07-30  3:22     ` Willy Tarreau
2020-07-30  6:14       ` Willy Tarreau
2020-07-30  9:59         ` Marc Zyngier
2020-07-30 10:09           ` Catalin Marinas
2020-07-30 15:00             ` Will Deacon
2020-07-30 17:49         ` Kees Cook
2020-07-30 18:24     ` Linus Torvalds
2020-07-30 18:47       ` Kees Cook
2020-06-04 22:37 Stephen Rothwell
2020-06-05  0:04 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-06-05  9:48   ` Jessica Yu
2020-04-20 10:23 Stephen Rothwell
2020-01-31  4:12 Stephen Rothwell
2020-01-31  4:17 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-01-31  9:39   ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-10-09 23:21 Stephen Rothwell
2012-10-09 23:45 ` Andrew Morton
2012-10-09 23:52   ` Yasuaki Ishimatsu
2012-10-10  3:12     ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-10-10  0:07   ` Stephen Rothwell
2012-06-04  2:57 Stephen Rothwell
2012-06-04  7:39 ` Paul Mundt
2012-01-18 23:31 Stephen Rothwell
2012-01-19  8:21 ` Jens Axboe
2012-01-19  8:23   ` Jens Axboe
2011-11-06 23:12 Stephen Rothwell
2011-11-07  1:52 ` David Miller
2011-11-07  2:47   ` Stephen Rothwell
2011-11-07  3:36     ` David Miller
2011-11-07  5:29       ` Kirsher, Jeffrey T
2011-11-07 16:46         ` Rose, Gregory V
2011-11-07 17:46           ` Rose, Gregory V
2011-07-25  1:16 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=75e2514c-7647-4d3b-9c55-c6e5c615c92e@kernel.org \
    --to=krzk@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=kent.overstreet@linux$(echo .)dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation$(echo .)org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox