public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Sojka <sojkam1@fel•cvut.cz>
To: Aaron Conole <aconole@bytheb•org>
Cc: linux-next@vger•kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>,
	Florian Westphal <fw@strlen•de>,
	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter•org>,
	netdev@vger•kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger•kernel.org,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail•com>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail•com>
Subject: error: 'struct net_device' has no member named 'nf_hooks_ingress'
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2016 22:56:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wphm1pn8.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161004004801.GA4661@swordfish>

Hi,

On Tue, Oct 04 2016, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (09/27/16 19:03), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>> On (09/27/16 16:40), Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> > 
>> > Changes since 20160923:
>> > 
>> 
>> seems that commit e3b37f11e6e4e6b6 ("netfilter: replace list_head with
>> single linked list") breaks the build on !CONFIG_NETFILTER_INGRESS systems
>> accessing ->nf_hooks_ingress

this commit is now in mainline as
e3b37f11e6e4e6b6f02cc762f182ce233d2c1c9d and it breaks my build:

    net/netfilter/core.c: In function 'nf_set_hooks_head':
    net/netfilter/core.c:96:3: error: 'struct net_device' has no member named 'nf_hooks_ingress'

Are the fixes (see below) on the way to mainline too?

Thanks.
-Michal



>> 
>> static void nf_set_hooks_head(struct net *net, const struct nf_hook_ops *reg,
>>                              struct nf_hook_entry *entry)
>> {
>>        switch (reg->pf) {
>>        case NFPROTO_NETDEV:
>>                /* We already checked in nf_register_net_hook() that this is
>>                 * used from ingress.
>>                 */
>>                rcu_assign_pointer(reg->dev->nf_hooks_ingress, entry);
>> 					^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>
> so I see two commits in linux-next now that fix the commit in question in
> two patches
>
>  : commit 7816ec564ec40ae20bb7925f733a181cad0cc491 ("netfilter: accommodate
>  : different kconfig in nf_set_hooks_head")
>  :
>  :    When CONFIG_NETFILTER_INGRESS is unset (or no), we need to handle
>  :    the request for registration properly by dropping the hook.  This
>  :    releases the entry during the set.
>  :
>  :    Fixes: e3b37f11e6e4 ("netfilter: replace list_head with single linked list")
>
> and
>
>  : commit 5119e4381a90fabd3442bde02707cbd9e5d7367a ("netfilter: Fix potential
>  : null pointer dereference")
>  :
>  :    It's possible for nf_hook_entry_head to return NULL.  If two
>  :    nf_unregister_net_hook calls happen simultaneously with a single hook
>  :    entry in the list, both will enter the nf_hook_mutex critical section.
>  :    The first will successfully delete the head, but the second will see
>  :    this NULL pointer and attempt to dereference.
>  :
>  :    This fix ensures that no null pointer dereference could occur when such
>  :    a condition happens.
>  :
>  :    Fixes: e3b37f11e6e4 ("netfilter: replace list_head with single linked list")
>
>
> do you guys plan to fold those into "e3b37f11e6e4" (a preferred way)
> or will send it out as 3 separate patches (um, why) ?
>
> 	-ss

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-05 20:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-27  6:40 linux-next: Tree for Sep 27 Stephen Rothwell
2016-09-27 10:03 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-10-04  0:48   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2016-10-05 20:56     ` Michal Sojka [this message]
2016-10-05 21:11       ` error: 'struct net_device' has no member named 'nf_hooks_ingress' Eric Dumazet
2016-10-06  4:31         ` Sergey Senozhatsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87wphm1pn8.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz \
    --to=sojkam1@fel$(echo .)cvut.cz \
    --cc=aconole@bytheb$(echo .)org \
    --cc=fw@strlen$(echo .)de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter$(echo .)org \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail$(echo .)com \
    --cc=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox