public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel•dk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst•de>,
	Abdul Haleem <abdhalee@linux•vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists•ozlabs.org>,
	linux-xfs <linux-xfs@vger•kernel.org>,
	linux-next <linux-next@vger•kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org>,
	chandan <chandan@linux•vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [XFS][trinity] WARNING: CPU: 32 PID: 31369 at fs/iomap.c:993
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 09:28:55 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8abed401-1634-760f-6543-4652fa495315@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170918152706.GA11482@lst.de>

On 09/18/2017 09:27 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 08:26:05PM +0530, Abdul Haleem wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> A warning is triggered from:
>>
>> file fs/iomap.c in function iomap_dio_rw
>>
>>     if (ret)
>>         goto out_free_dio;
>>
>>     ret = invalidate_inode_pages2_range(mapping,
>>             start >> PAGE_SHIFT, end >> PAGE_SHIFT);
>>>>  WARN_ON_ONCE(ret);
>>     ret = 0;
>>
>>     inode_dio_begin(inode);
> 
> This is expected and an indication of a problematic workload - which
> may be triggered by a fuzzer.

If it's expected, why don't we kill the WARN_ON_ONCE()? I get it all
the time running xfstests as well.

-- 
Jens Axboe

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-18 15:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-18 14:56 [linux-next][XFS][trinity] WARNING: CPU: 32 PID: 31369 at fs/iomap.c:993 Abdul Haleem
2017-09-18 15:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-18 15:28   ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2017-09-18 15:39     ` [XFS][trinity] " Christoph Hellwig
2017-09-18 15:43       ` [linux-next][XFS][trinity] " Al Viro
2017-09-18 15:51         ` [XFS][trinity] " Jens Axboe
2017-09-18 21:53           ` [linux-next][XFS][trinity] " Dave Chinner
2017-09-18 21:31     ` Dave Chinner
2017-09-18 22:00       ` Eric Sandeen
2017-09-18 22:04         ` [XFS][trinity] " Darrick J. Wong
2017-09-18 22:05         ` [linux-next][XFS][trinity] " Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8abed401-1634-760f-6543-4652fa495315@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel$(echo .)dk \
    --cc=abdhalee@linux$(echo .)vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=chandan@linux$(echo .)vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=hch@lst$(echo .)de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists$(echo .)ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox