public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead•org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead•org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix•de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel•org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor•com>,
	Marco Elver <elver@google•com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger•kernel.org>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel•org>,
	Linux Documentation <linux-doc@vger•kernel.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn•net>
Subject: Re: linux-next: [DOCS] build warning after merge of the tip tree
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2026 17:06:28 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <91c5386a-2c1b-476a-b189-86d80c0d9e96@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <803d1946-6935-452d-953a-90f6e73d53a2@infradead.org>

+ linux-doc + Jon

On 1/7/26 2:10 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> 
> 
> On 1/7/26 1:54 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 07, 2026 at 04:15:48PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs) produced
>>> this warning:
>>>
>>> Documentation/core-api/kref:328: include/linux/kref.h:72: WARNING: Invalid C declaration: Expected end of definition. [error at 96]
>>>   int kref_put_mutex (struct kref *kref, void (*release)(struct kref *kref), str
>>> uct mutex *mutex) __cond_acquires(true# mutex)
>>>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------^
>>> Documentation/core-api/kref:328: include/linux/kref.h:94: WARNING: Invalid C declaration: Expected end of definition. [error at 92]
>>>   int kref_put_lock (struct kref *kref, void (*release)(struct kref *kref), spinlock_t *lock) __cond_acquires(true# lock)
>>>   --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------^
>>>
>>> Introduced by commit
>>>
>>>   5e256db9325e ("kref: Add context-analysis annotations")
>>
>> I really have no clue what that thing is on about. The code is fine and
>> works as intended.
>>
>> My go-to fix for anything kdoc is to change '/**' into '/*' until it
>> goes away.
> 
> Yes, that works.
> 
> I think that kernel-doc is just confused by the trailing __cond_acquires(true# lock).
> 
> Mauro, would you take a look, please?
We can trivially ignore "__cond_acquires(.*)" in kernel-doc to
eliminate such build warnings.

Is that sufficient? Sure.
Is it the right thing to do? IDK.
Comments?

~Randy
---
 tools/lib/python/kdoc/kdoc_parser.py |    1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

--- a/tools/lib/python/kdoc/kdoc_parser.py
+++ b/tools/lib/python/kdoc/kdoc_parser.py
@@ -186,6 +186,7 @@ function_xforms  = [
     (KernRe(r"__sched +"), ""),
     (KernRe(r"_noprof"), ""),
     (KernRe(r"__always_unused *"), ""),
+    (KernRe(r"__cond_acquires\s*\(.*\)"), ""),
     (KernRe(r"__printf\s*\(\s*\d*\s*,\s*\d*\s*\) +"), ""),
     (KernRe(r"__(?:re)?alloc_size\s*\(\s*\d+\s*(?:,\s*\d+\s*)?\) +"), ""),
     (KernRe(r"__diagnose_as\s*\(\s*\S+\s*(?:,\s*\d+\s*)*\) +"), ""),


  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-23  1:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-07  5:15 linux-next: build warning after merge of the tip tree Stephen Rothwell
2026-01-07 21:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-01-07 22:10   ` Randy Dunlap
2026-01-23  1:06     ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2026-01-23  7:11       ` linux-next: [DOCS] " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2026-01-23  7:17         ` Randy Dunlap
2026-01-23 11:28         ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-01-23 12:20           ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2026-01-23 15:18             ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-01-24  0:37               ` Randy Dunlap

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=91c5386a-2c1b-476a-b189-86d80c0d9e96@infradead.org \
    --to=rdunlap@infradead$(echo .)org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn$(echo .)net \
    --cc=elver@google$(echo .)com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead$(echo .)org \
    --cc=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix$(echo .)de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox