Subject: Re: Re: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net-next tree

From: "Bernard Metzler" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 12:29:21 +0000

-----"Jason Gunthorpe" <[email-masked]> wrote: -----

>To: "Bernard Metzler" <[email-masked]>
>From: "Jason Gunthorpe" <[email-masked]>
>Date: 07/11/2019 01:53PM
>Cc: "Leon Romanovsky" <[email-masked]>, "Stephen Rothwell"
><[email-masked]>, "Doug Ledford" <[email-masked]>, "David
>Miller" <[email-masked]>, "Networking" <[email-masked]>,
>"Linux Next Mailing List" <[email-masked]>, "Linux Kernel
>Mailing List" <[email-masked]>
>Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of
>the net-next tree
>
>On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 08:00:49AM +0000, Bernard Metzler wrote:
>
>> That listen will not sleep. The socket is just marked
>> listening. 
>
>Eh? siw_listen_address() calls siw_cep_alloc() which does:
>
>	struct siw_cep *cep = kzalloc(sizeof(*cep), GFP_KERNEL);
>
>Which is sleeping. Many other cases too.
>
>Jason
>
>
Ah, true! I was after really deep sleeps like user level
socket accept() calls ;) So you are correct of course.

Thanks!
Bernard