Subject: Re: btrfs: super.c:416:25: error: 'ret' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'net'?

From: Bagas Sanjaya <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 14:08:13 +0700

On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 05:55:51PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> Following x86 and i386 build regressions noticed on Linux next-20231128 tag.
> 
> Build log:
> -----------
> fs/btrfs/super.c: In function 'btrfs_parse_param':
> fs/btrfs/super.c:416:25: error: 'ret' undeclared (first use in this
> function); did you mean 'net'?
>   416 |                         ret = -EINVAL;
>       |                         ^~~
>       |                         net
> fs/btrfs/super.c:416:25: note: each undeclared identifier is reported
> only once for each function it appears in
> fs/btrfs/super.c:417:25: error: label 'out' used but not defined
>   417 |                         goto out;
>       |                         ^~~~
> make[5]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:243: fs/btrfs/super.o] Error 1
> 
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <[email-masked]>
> 
> Links:
>  - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20231128/testrun/21349057/suite/build/test/gcc-13-lkftconfig-kselftest/log
> 
>  - https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-next-master/build/next-20231128/testrun/21349057/suite/build/test/gcc-13-lkftconfig-kselftest/details/
>  - https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2Ymoxor9n54ID51BFjRBS06YQ3U/
> - https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2Ymoxor9n54ID51BFjRBS06YQ3U/config
> 

Is it W=1 build? I can't reproduce on btrfs tree with
CONFIG_BTRFS_FS_POSIX_ACL=y and without W=1.

Thanks.

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara