Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the workqueues tree

From: Tejun Heo <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 10:13:04 -1000

Hello,

I applied the following patch to wq/for-6.10.

The offending line wasn't introduced recently tho. It goes way back.
5797b1c18919 just touches the surrounding lines. Maybe that triggered
something?

Thanks.
------ 8< ------
>From 51da7f68edae38e81543d57fd71811f7481c0472 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tejun Heo <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 10:03:13 -1000
Subject: [PATCH] workqueue: Use "@..." in function comment to describe
 variable length argument

Previously, it was using "remaining args" without leading "@" which isn't
valid. Let's follow snprintf()'s example and use "@...".

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <[email-masked]>
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <[email-masked]>
---
 include/linux/workqueue.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/workqueue.h b/include/linux/workqueue.h
index 2df1188c0f96..fb3993894536 100644
--- a/include/linux/workqueue.h
+++ b/include/linux/workqueue.h
@@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ void workqueue_softirq_dead(unsigned int cpu);
  * @fmt: printf format for the name of the workqueue
  * @flags: WQ_* flags
  * @max_active: max in-flight work items, 0 for default
- * remaining args: args for @fmt
+ * @...: args for @fmt
  *
  * For a per-cpu workqueue, @max_active limits the number of in-flight work
  * items for each CPU. e.g. @max_active of 1 indicates that each CPU can be
-- 
2.44.0