public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@kernel•org>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <ukleinek@kernel•org>,
	"Daniel Gomez" <da.gomez@samsung•com>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel•org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>,
	Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google•com>,
	Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@suse•com>,
	Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@kernel•org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger•kernel.org>,
	Michal Wilczynski <m.wilczynski@samsung•com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pwm tree with the modules tree
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 14:59:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ad9c5b79-8a33-4183-a048-48ba516e6aaf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f374sh5rsbxvboowft6xpiimxlzw264i32txgiok53on2vxxu7@lpetaklaofzb>



On 07/11/2025 17.44, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2025 at 10:54:15AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> [adding the modules tree contacts]
>>
>> On Tue, 4 Nov 2025 10:48:27 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au> wrote:
>>>
>>> Today's linux-next merge of the pwm tree got a conflict in:
>>>
>>>   rust/macros/module.rs
>>>
>>> between commits:
>>>
>>>   3809d7a89fe5 ("rust: module: use a reference in macros::module::module")
>>>   0b24f9740f26 ("rust: module: update the module macro with module parameter support")
>>>
>>> from the modules tree and commit:
>>>
>>>   927687809649 ("rust: macros: Add support for 'imports_ns' to module!")
> 
> I reshuffled my tree such that the import_ns commit sits directly on top
> of 6.18-rc1. The new commit-id is 739ad9be61e5.
> 
>>> from the pwm tree.
>>> [...]
>>>  -    if let Some(imports) = info.imports_ns {
>>> ++    if let Some(imports) = &info.imports_ns {
>>> +         for ns in imports {
>>> +             modinfo.emit("import_ns", &ns);
>>> +         }
>>> +     }
> 
> Given that the conflict resolution is non-trivial and we already know
> what to do, I suggest you merge my commit into the modules tree.

Do you mean creating a separate branch that includes the conflict resolution, to
be used as an example when sending the PR?

  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-10 13:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-03 23:48 linux-next: manual merge of the pwm tree with the modules tree Stephen Rothwell
2025-11-03 23:54 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-11-04  8:48   ` Daniel Gomez
2025-11-04 21:17     ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-11-07 16:44   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2025-11-10 13:59     ` Daniel Gomez [this message]
2025-11-10 15:42       ` Uwe Kleine-König
2025-11-10 15:54         ` Daniel Gomez
2025-11-10 18:32           ` Uwe Kleine-König

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ad9c5b79-8a33-4183-a048-48ba516e6aaf@kernel.org \
    --to=da.gomez@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=a.hindborg@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=da.gomez@samsung$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=m.wilczynski@samsung$(echo .)com \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=petr.pavlu@suse$(echo .)com \
    --cc=samitolvanen@google$(echo .)com \
    --cc=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
    --cc=ukleinek@kernel$(echo .)org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox