Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning in Linus'tree

From: Linus Torvalds <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 08:29:02 -0700 (PDT)

On Wed, 26 May 2010, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> 
> If my suggestion above works, then one could start transforming current uses of __BYTE_ORDER,
> into similar constructs and once all are done, #define both __LITTLE_ENDIAN/__BIG_ENDIAN and
> move back to #if __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN

No. Don't do it. Why the hell would we want to use the inferior model?

		Linus