From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation•org>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel•com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp•com.au>,
Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail•com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>,
"linux-next@vger•kernel.org" <linux-next@vger•kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org>
Subject: RE: linux-next: Tree for June 3
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2010 15:57:13 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1006041548480.8175@i5.linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <987664A83D2D224EAE907B061CE93D530114C3DE4D@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com>
On Fri, 4 Jun 2010, Luck, Tony wrote:
>
> It gets rid of the oops. So that's good. Something is still
> hokey in linux-next land though because no modules get loaded.
> So no ehci/uhci available :-(
So maybe the error (the one that caused us to exit and caused the oops due
to the wrong return value) is the one that now causes it to not load.
I note that ia64 has a pretty big/complex module_frob_arch_sections().
Many architectures (like x86) has a trivial one ("return 0;"), and there
might be some ordering differences in the setup that only matter with
architectures that do odd things there..
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-04 22:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-03 3:47 linux-next: Tree for June 3 Stephen Rothwell
2010-06-03 7:39 ` Dave Young
2010-06-03 8:00 ` Dave Young
2010-06-03 8:16 ` Dave Young
2010-06-03 12:52 ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-04 19:46 ` Tony Luck
2010-06-04 20:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-04 20:46 ` Luck, Tony
2010-06-04 22:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-06-04 22:50 ` Luck, Tony
2010-06-04 22:57 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2010-06-05 2:39 ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-05 2:51 ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-05 4:01 ` Rusty Russell
2010-06-07 18:16 ` Luck, Tony
2010-06-03 15:46 ` linux-next: Tree for June 3 (qlcnic) Randy Dunlap
2010-06-03 17:31 ` Anirban Chakraborty
[not found] ` <20100603134753.710a64b3.sfr-3FnU+UHB4dNDw9hX6IcOSA@public.gmane.org>
2010-06-03 15:55 ` linux-next: Tree for June 3 (iwlwifi) Randy Dunlap
2010-06-03 17:21 ` John W. Linville
[not found] ` <20100603172114.GA14597-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org>
2010-06-03 17:42 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-06-03 17:45 ` reinette chatre
2010-06-03 16:39 ` [PATCH -next] classmate-laptop: fix for RFKILL=m, CMPC=y Randy Dunlap
2010-06-09 20:02 ` Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
2010-06-09 20:05 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-06-09 20:11 ` Matthew Garrett
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-06-03 6:38 linux-next: Tree for June 3 Stephen Rothwell
2009-06-03 9:09 Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-03 8:30 Stephen Rothwell
2008-06-04 11:28 ` Dmitri Vorobiev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1006041548480.8175@i5.linux-foundation.org \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation$(echo .)org \
--cc=hidave.darkstar@gmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp$(echo .)com.au \
--cc=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
--cc=tony.luck@intel$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox