Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Dec 14 (security/integrity/ima/)

From: James Morris <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2018 05:00:43 +1100 (AEDT)

On Fri, 14 Dec 2018, Paul Gortmaker wrote:

> >From 31081a8b46e84d64e2fbda8d0d82ba26d56cc468 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Paul Gortmaker <[email-masked]>
> Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 16:48:07 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] security: integrity: partial revert of make ima_main
>  explicitly non-modular
> 
> In commit 4f83d5ea643a ("security: integrity: make ima_main explicitly
> non-modular") I'd removed <linux/module.h> after assuming that the
> function is_module_sig_enforced() was an LSM function and not a core
> kernel module function.
> 
> Unfortunately the typical .config selections used in build testing
> provide an implicit <linux/module.h> presence, and so normal/typical
> build testing did not immediately reveal my incorrect assumption.
> 
> Cc: Mimi Zohar <[email-masked]>
> Cc: Dmitry Kasatkin <[email-masked]>
> Cc: James Morris <[email-masked]>
> Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email-masked]>
> Cc: [email-masked]
> Cc: [email-masked]
> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <[email-masked]>
> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <[email-masked]>
> 
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> index adaf96932237..616a88f95b92 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
>  
>  #define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
>  
> -#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/file.h>
>  #include <linux/binfmts.h>
>  #include <linux/mount.h>
> 

Applied to
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jmorris/linux-security.git next-general
and next-testing

-- 
James Morris
<[email-masked]>