From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard•com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb•auug.org.au>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@linux•ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll•ch>,
Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@lists•freedesktop.org>,
DRI <dri-devel@lists•freedesktop.org>
Cc: Junlin Yang <yangjunlin@yulong•com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger•kernel.org>,
Menglong Dong <dong.menglong@zte•com.cn>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the drm-misc-fixes tree
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 08:51:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d9a7932c-b988-905c-d1e8-2cbe10fa9f29@ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210318120221.6dc8f33b@canb.auug.org.au>
On 18/03/2021 03:02, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dsi.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 690911544275 ("drm/omap: dsi: fix unsigned expression compared with zero")
>
> from the drm-misc-fixes tree and commit:
>
> bbd13d6a7b2e ("drm/omap: dsi: fix unreachable code in dsi_vc_send_short()")
>
> from the drm tree.
>
> I fixed it up (these do basically the same thing, so I used the former
> version) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as
> linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned
> to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.
> You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the
> conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
Yes, I messed that up. I accidentally merged a fix to drm-misc-fixes,
but almost similar fix was already in drm-misc-next. Sorry about that.
Tomi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-18 6:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-18 1:02 linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the drm-misc-fixes tree Stephen Rothwell
2021-03-18 6:51 ` Tomi Valkeinen [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-03-20 14:17 Mark Brown
2026-03-20 15:39 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-04-08 17:26 ` Mark Brown
2026-04-09 7:47 ` Boris Brezillon
2026-03-18 14:36 Mark Brown
2026-03-18 15:49 ` Luca Ceresoli
2026-03-18 18:20 ` Cristian Ciocaltea
2026-01-05 2:21 Stephen Rothwell
2025-08-20 1:21 Stephen Rothwell
2025-08-20 10:30 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-08-20 21:29 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-07-18 4:41 Stephen Rothwell
2025-07-18 6:27 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2025-01-14 1:30 Stephen Rothwell
2023-11-22 0:29 Stephen Rothwell
2023-11-28 10:04 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-09-28 2:05 Stephen Rothwell
2023-06-27 1:54 Stephen Rothwell
2023-07-11 1:17 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-11-21 2:06 Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-11 2:47 Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-11 8:05 ` Christian König
2022-07-17 23:44 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-19 7:35 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-07-27 2:55 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-27 3:24 ` Dave Airlie
2022-07-27 5:37 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-03-18 0:55 Stephen Rothwell
2022-03-18 1:06 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-12-22 3:50 Stephen Rothwell
2021-12-22 7:31 ` Christian König
2021-11-29 23:33 Stephen Rothwell
2021-11-30 8:58 ` Maxime Ripard
2021-11-30 20:35 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-10-22 0:53 Stephen Rothwell
2021-06-17 1:42 Stephen Rothwell
2021-04-09 3:12 Stephen Rothwell
2020-07-28 3:41 Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-01 3:45 Stephen Rothwell
2020-03-01 23:43 Stephen Rothwell
2019-09-15 21:18 Mark Brown
2019-09-16 5:29 ` Vasily Khoruzhick
2019-09-17 2:43 ` Qiang Yu
2019-08-26 3:06 Stephen Rothwell
2019-08-29 10:11 ` james qian wang (Arm Technology China)
2018-11-26 2:37 Stephen Rothwell
2018-03-08 0:47 Stephen Rothwell
2017-12-13 23:59 Stephen Rothwell
2017-01-17 0:59 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d9a7932c-b988-905c-d1e8-2cbe10fa9f29@ideasonboard.com \
--to=tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard$(echo .)com \
--cc=airlied@linux$(echo .)ie \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll$(echo .)ch \
--cc=dong.menglong@zte$(echo .)com.cn \
--cc=dri-devel@lists$(echo .)freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists$(echo .)freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb$(echo .)auug.org.au \
--cc=yangjunlin@yulong$(echo .)com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox