Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the mm tree

From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 23:43:08 +0000

On Tue, 2024-05-14 at 09:41 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > diff --git a/io_uring/memmap.c b/io_uring/memmap.c
> > index acf5e8ca6b28..5c9e70132cd1 100644
> > --- a/io_uring/memmap.c
> > +++ b/io_uring/memmap.c
> > @@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ unsigned long io_uring_get_unmapped_area(struct file
> > *filp, unsigned long addr,
> >   #else
> >   	addr = 0UL;
> >   #endif
> > -	return current->mm->get_unmapped_area(filp, addr, len, pgoff,
> > flags);
> > +	return mm_get_unmapped_area(current->mm, filp, addr, len, pgoff,
> > flags);
> >   }
> >   
> >   #else /* !CONFIG_MMU */
> > -- 
> > 2.43.0
> 
> This is now a conflict between the mm-stable tree and Linus' tree.

Resolution looks good to me. Andrew, do you want me to do anything here?