public inbox for linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jaap-Jan Boor <jjboor@aimsys•nl>
To: Per Hallsmark <per.hallsmark@t2data•se>
Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs•org
Subject: Re: Question about cpm reset on 8xx
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 15:53:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1107442436.32038.30.camel@linpc003.aimsys.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41FFBC75@webmail>

On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 15:29, Per Hallsmark wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Working with a board using hdlc over SCC channel (852T) and kernel 2.4.21,
> in the cpm reset code in arch/ppc/8xx_io/commproc.c it's like:
> 
> void
> m8xx_cpm_reset()
> {
>         volatile immap_t         *imp;
>         volatile cpm8xx_t       *commproc;
>         pte_t                   *pte;
> 
> 
>         imp = (immap_t *)IMAP_ADDR;
>         commproc = (cpm8xx_t *)&imp->im_cpm;
> 
>  
> #ifdef CONFIG_UCODE_PATCH
>         /* Perform a reset.
>         */
>         commproc->cp_cpcr = (CPM_CR_RST | CPM_CR_FLG);
> 
> 
>         /* Wait for it.
>         */
>         while (commproc->cp_cpcr & CPM_CR_FLG);
> 
> 
>         cpm_load_patch(imp);
> #endif
>      .......
> 
> In our case, CONFIG_UCODE_PATCH is not defined so the commproc is never
> reseted during reboot. Could it be that the #ifdef CONFIG_UCODE_PATCH
> should just be around the cpm_load_patch command?

It seems the author wants to reset the cpm only when microcode 
patches are needed. 

m8260_cpm_reset() does also not reset the cpm.

I don't know why (e.g. the console is setup after this)

Jaap-Jan

> The CONFIG_UCODE_PATCH seems to point this to be i2c/spi patch, but
> shouldn't a reset go to cpm in anycase?
> 
> /Per
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-embedded mailing list
> Linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs•org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded

  reply	other threads:[~2005-02-03 15:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-02-03 14:29 Question about cpm reset on 8xx Per Hallsmark
2005-02-03 14:53 ` Jaap-Jan Boor [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-02-03 15:02 Per Hallsmark
2005-02-03 15:34 ` Dan Malek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1107442436.32038.30.camel@linpc003.aimsys.nl \
    --to=jjboor@aimsys$(echo .)nl \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs$(echo .)org \
    --cc=per.hallsmark@t2data$(echo .)se \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox