public inbox for linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel•crashing.org>
To: Takeharu KATO <kato.takeharu@jp•fujitsu.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev list <linuxppc-dev@ozlabs•org>
Subject: Re: boot time scheduling hile atomic
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 11:18:05 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1110932285.25201.66.camel@gaston> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4231387D.6030204@jp.fujitsu.com>

On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 15:19 +0900, Takeharu KATO wrote:
> Hi Joerg:
> 
> First of all, I am sorry to making mistake on my stack analysis.
> After all, I found what is wrong.
> 
> The syscall_exit_work is called(jumped) by fork, strictly speaking,
> this is caused by kernel_thead for init process.
> At this point, kernel set a need_resched flag in thread_info struct
> (flags member).
> So, the system executes syscall_exit_work when
> the swapper thread exited from syscall.
> 
> However, the syscall_exit_work routine does not check
> preempt counts when it calls schedule function.
> 
> FYI, I post the patch which fix this problem.
> I've confirmed the problem has been removed by this patch,
> but I can not figure out whether it is truely
> correct or not.

I think the problem is more why are we calling a syscall while the
preempt count is up ?

Ben.

  reply	other threads:[~2005-03-16  0:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-03 12:44 GCC4 fun Joerg Dorchain
2005-03-03 13:13 ` Marc Leeman
2005-03-03 13:46 ` evilninja
2005-03-03 14:18   ` boot time scheduling hile atomic (was: GCC4 fun.) Joerg Dorchain
2005-03-04  7:57     ` Joerg Dorchain
2005-03-04 15:06       ` boot time scheduling hile atomic _evil
2005-03-10  4:51       ` Takeharu KATO
2005-03-10  7:28         ` Joerg Dorchain
2005-03-10 16:19           ` Takeharu KATO
2005-03-11  6:19             ` Takeharu KATO
2005-03-16  0:18               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2005-03-16  5:24                 ` Takeharu KATO
2005-03-16  5:49                   ` Takeharu KATO
2005-03-16  6:28                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-03-16 14:07                       ` Takeharu KATO
2005-03-16 22:28                         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-03-17  0:46                           ` Takeharu KATO
2005-03-11 22:21           ` boot time scheduling while atomic Takeharu KATO
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-06-10 14:23 boot time scheduling hile atomic Rune Torgersen
2005-06-14 12:41 ` Takeharu KATO

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1110932285.25201.66.camel@gaston \
    --to=benh@kernel$(echo .)crashing.org \
    --cc=kato.takeharu@jp$(echo .)fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs$(echo .)org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox