Subject: Re: [RFC] New target 'cuImage' - compatibility uImage

From: Matthew McClintock <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 11:02:14 -0500

On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 23:56 +0800, Li Yang wrote:
> 
> If U-boot supports uncompressed kernel image in uImage, I think it
> will be better to use this scheme:
> 
> u-boot header + wrapper + FDT + compressed kernel image
> 
> As kernel image will be uncompressed to its loading address directly.
> While in your proposal, it needs to be moved one more time.
> 

This is an option. But, I do not see a reason why you would not still
opt to compress everything. Especially since it is already working.
Comments anyone?

-Matthew