Subject: Re: [RFC] 4xx hardware watchpoint support

From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 14:00:33 +1000

On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 13:10 -0300, Luis Machado wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 11:53 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > Shouldn't this (and other places) be:
> > 
> > #if defined(CONFIG_44x) || defined(CONFIG_BOOKE)
> > 
> > if you are going to exclude 40x for now?  Otherwise this is still
> > enabled on 405 and setting the wrong register.
> > 
> > josh
> 
> Yes, sorry. I wasn't aware of this specific define value. It makes
> things easier to support 405's later.
> 
> Like so?

Please, next time, when you re-send a patch like that, re-include
the full subject and patch description. You can add then blurbs after
the --- line if you want to add things that won't make it to git.

I'll deal with that specific one for now.

Cheers,
Ben.