Subject: Re: [PATCH] Wire up recvmmsg syscall

From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:21:12 +1100

On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 15:11 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email-masked]>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/systbl.h |    2 ++
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/unistd.h |    3 ++-
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/systbl.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/systbl.h
> index 07d2d19..0e92c23 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/systbl.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/systbl.h
> @@ -326,3 +326,5 @@ SYSCALL_SPU(perf_event_open)
>  COMPAT_SYS_SPU(preadv)
>  COMPAT_SYS_SPU(pwritev)
>  COMPAT_SYS(rt_tgsigqueueinfo)
> +COMPAT_SYS_SPU(recvmmsg)
> +

Ignore. We don't need it, it's part of socketcalls. In fact, i386
neither, it's a bug there.

Cheers,
Ben.