Subject: Re: [BUG] PCI related panic on powerpc based board with 3.10-rcX

From: Scott Wood <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 16:50:26 -0500

On 06/12/2013 03:19:30 AM, Rojhalat Ibrahim wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 June 2013 12:28:59 Scott Wood wrote:
> > Yes, I figured it was non-PCIe because the code change that you said
> > helped was on the non-PCIe branch of the if/else.  Generally it's =20
> good
> > to explicitly mention the chip you're using, though.
> >
> > fsl_setup_indirect_pci should be renamed to fsl_setup_indirect_pcie.
> > Your patch above should be applied, and fsl_setup_indirect_pcie =20
> should
> > be moved into the booke/86xx ifdef to avoid an unused function =20
> warning.
> >
> > -Scott
>=20
> How about this patch? It uses setup_indirect_pci for the PCI case in
> mpc83xx_add_bridge. Additionally it adds a check in =20
> fsl_setup_indirect_pci
> to only use the modified read function in case of PCIe.

If we're adding the check to fsl_setup_indirect_pci, there's no need to =20
change the 83xx call back to setup_indirect_pci.  I see that 85xx is =20
also callirng fsl_setup_indirect_pci for both; it'd be good to be =20
consistent.

In any case, can you send a proper patch with a signoff and commit =20
message?

-Scott=