From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel•crashing.org>
To: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm•com>
Cc: "devicetree@vger•kernel.org" <devicetree@vger•kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@vger•kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger•kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro•org>,
"linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org>,
"rob.herring@calxeda•com" <rob.herring@calxeda•com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk•pl>,
Olof Johansson <olof@lixom•net>,
linuxppc-dev@lists•ozlabs.org,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists•infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] DT/core: cpu_ofnode updates for v3.12
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 07:03:59 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1376427839.4255.10.camel@pasglop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <520A536C.3030600@arm.com>
On Tue, 2013-08-13 at 16:40 +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
> There seems to be conflict in the new function "of_get_cpu_node" added.
> PowerPC also defines the same function name. Further microblaze and
> openrisc declares it(can be removed) but doesn't define it.
> To fix this:
> 1. I can rename the newly added function to something different like
> `of_get_cpunode` or
> 2. If of_* namespace should be used by only OF/FDT and not by any
> architecture specific code, then the arch specific version can be
> renamed to some thing like arch_of_get_cpu_node.
> Also most of the calls to arch specific function can be moved to
> generic code.
>
> Let me know your thoughts.
What is your new function about ? Does it perform the same job as the
one in powerpc ? If yes, make sure you have the same signature and
either copy the powerpc one over to a generic place or make the generic
one weak if you don't want the powerpc thread counting logic.
Cheers,
Ben.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-13 21:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <5208E2D3.7060005@arm.com>
[not found] ` <3356439.a21MloFP7n@vostro.rjw.lan>
2013-08-13 15:40 ` [GIT PULL] DT/core: cpu_ofnode updates for v3.12 Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-13 18:29 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-13 21:07 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-14 10:01 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-14 11:37 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-14 13:21 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-14 22:57 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-14 12:53 ` Rob Herring
2013-08-14 13:27 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-13 18:37 ` Michal Simek
2013-08-14 8:41 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-13 18:44 ` Rob Herring
2013-08-13 19:45 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-13 21:09 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-14 9:23 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-13 21:08 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-13 21:03 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1376427839.4255.10.camel@pasglop \
--to=benh@kernel$(echo .)crashing.org \
--cc=Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm$(echo .)com \
--cc=devicetree@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists$(echo .)infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists$(echo .)ozlabs.org \
--cc=olof@lixom$(echo .)net \
--cc=rjw@sisk$(echo .)pl \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda$(echo .)com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro$(echo .)org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox