Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V3 3/5] powerpc/cpuidle: Generic powerpc backend cpuidle driver.

From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 15:58:17 +1000

On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 11:20 +0530, Deepthi Dharwar wrote:
> But if having cpuidle backend-driver separately for other powerpc arcs
> makes sense such that each one have their own state information etc
> then it makes sense to name the files as cpuidle-power.c,
> cpuilde-ppc32.c and so on.

If by "power" you mean IBM POWER machines/CPUs, then make it
cpuidle-ibm-power or cpuidle-book3s64 maybe to clarify what families it
affects.

Cheers
Ben.