Subject: Re: [PATCH] Powerpc/dts: Correct sdhci quirk for bsc9131

From: Scott Wood <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 14:42:57 -0500

On Mon, 2013-09-16 at 16:12 +0800, Zhang Haijun wrote:
> On 09/02/2013 06:37 PM, Haijun Zhang wrote:
> > We use property "sdhci,auto-cmd12" instead of "fsl,sdhci-auto-cmd12"
> > to distinguish if the sdhc host has quirk SDHCI_QUIRK_MULTIBLOCK_READ_ACMD12.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Haijun Zhang <[email-masked]>
> > ---
> >   arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/bsc9131si-post.dtsi | 2 +-
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/bsc9131si-post.dtsi b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/bsc9131si-post.dtsi
> > index 5180d9d..0c0efa9 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/bsc9131si-post.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/fsl/bsc9131si-post.dtsi
> > @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ usb@22000 {
> >
> >   /include/ "pq3-esdhc-0.dtsi"
> >   	sdhc@2e000 {
> > -		fsl,sdhci-auto-cmd12;
> > +		sdhci,auto-cmd12;
> >   		interrupts = <41 0x2 0 0>;
> >   	};
> >
> >
> 
> 
> Hi, scott
> 
> Could you help review this patch?

I process patches in periodic batches.  There's no need for a reminder
when it's only been two weeks, as long as it's still marked "new" or
"under review" in patchwork (and you should include a patchwork link in
any such reminder e-mail).  Especially for a trivial patch such as this,
no comment often means I looked at it and saw no problems and will take
it in the next batch.

Though if you want a comment, don't capitalize "powerpc" in the
subject. :-)

-Scott