Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] powernv, cpufreq: cpufreq driver for powernv platform

From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 23:56:17 +1100

On Thu, 2014-03-27 at 16:50 +0530, Gautham R Shenoy wrote:
> 
> Well, in the scenarios that we're interested in, it is highly unlikely
> that CONFIG_PREMPT is set. Hence we'll default to
> raw_smp_processor_id() anyway. So, I think we can retain
> smp_processor_id(). 

We don't know that. Some people are interested in running preempt
on these things. If raw is ok to call here, please use it.

Cheers,
Ben.