Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] powerpc/rcpm: add RCPM driver

From: Chenhui Zhao <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 10:46:08 +0800

On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 4:23 AM, Scott Wood <[email-masked]> 
wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-08-03 at 19:14 +0800, Chenhui Zhao wrote:
>>  On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Scott Wood <[email-masked]>
>>  wrote:
>>  > On Fri, 2015-06-26 at 15:44 +0800,  
>> [email-masked]:
>>  > >  +static void rcpm_v1_set_ip_power(bool enable, u32 *mask)
>>  > >  +{
>>  > >  +     if (enable)
>>  > >  +             setbits32(&rcpm_v1_regs->ippdexpcr, *mask);
>>  > >  +     else
>>  > >  +             clrbits32(&rcpm_v1_regs->ippdexpcr, *mask);
>>  > >  +}
>>  > >  +
>>  > >  +static void rcpm_v2_set_ip_power(bool enable, u32 *mask)
>>  > >  +{
>>  > >  +     if (enable)
>>  > >  +             setbits32(&rcpm_v2_regs->ippdexpcr[0], *mask);
>>  > >  +     else
>>  > >  +             clrbits32(&rcpm_v2_regs->ippdexpcr[0], *mask);
>>  > >  +}
>>  >
>>  > Why do these take "u32 *mask" instead of "u32 mask"?
>>  >
>>  > -Scott
>> 
>>  I think it can be used in the case where there are several mask 
>> values.
> 
> When would that be?
> 
> -Scott

So far, only use one register, even though the register name is 
"IPPDEXPCRn" (has "n" suffix) in T4 RM.

OK. Just change the parameter to "u32 mask".

-Chenhui