public inbox for linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman•id.au>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel•org>
Cc: Hemant Kumar <hemant@linux•vnet.ibm.com>,
	maddy@linux•vnet.ibm.com, srikar@linux•vnet.ibm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org, warrier@linux•vnet.ibm.com,
	paulus@samba•org, scottwood@freescale•com,
	sukadev@linux•vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists•ozlabs.org,
	mingo@kernel•org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] perf,kvm/powerpc: Add kvm_perf.h for powerpc
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2015 15:10:55 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1441602655.12945.5.camel@ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150904205145.GB3475@kernel.org>

On Fri, 2015-09-04 at 17:51 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 12:18:47PM +0530, Hemant Kumar escreveu:
> > >Should I try to process the 5 together, applying thest two first?
>  
> > Yes, this patchset needs to be applied before applying the other patchset,
> > since there is a direct dependency on these two for the tooling part to
> > work.
>  
> > >I see there are no acks from powerpc arch maintainers, how should we
> > >proceed here? If there are no problems with the arch bits, and if it is
> > >just to enable the tooling part, again, should I process the 5 as just
> > >one series?
>  
> > The reason to split the earlier patchset into two was to separate the
> > tooling/perf/ and arch/powerpc/ side patches, as asked by Michael..
>  
> > Here is the link to that discussion :
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org/msg86916.html
>  
> > If Michael is ok with the patches, you can process all the 5 patches
> > together. Michael?
> 
> Michael?

I'm not particularly happy with it.

Can we at least remove this hunk from the uapi header:

+/* This is to shut the compiler up */
+#define KVM_ENTRY_TRACE ""
+#define KVM_EXIT_TRACE ""
+#define KVM_EXIT_REASON ""


cheers

  reply	other threads:[~2015-09-07  5:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-31  6:48 [PATCH v6 1/2] perf,kvm/powerpc: Add kvm_perf.h for powerpc Hemant Kumar
2015-08-31  6:48 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] perf, kvm/powerpc: Add hcall related info to kvm_perf.h Hemant Kumar
2015-08-31 20:13 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] perf,kvm/powerpc: Add kvm_perf.h for powerpc Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-09-01  6:48   ` Hemant Kumar
2015-09-04 20:51     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-09-07  5:10       ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2015-09-08  4:56         ` Hemant Kumar
2015-09-08  8:33           ` Michael Ellerman
2015-09-08 15:10             ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1441602655.12945.5.camel@ellerman.id.au \
    --to=mpe@ellerman$(echo .)id.au \
    --cc=acme@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=hemant@linux$(echo .)vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists$(echo .)ozlabs.org \
    --cc=maddy@linux$(echo .)vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel$(echo .)org \
    --cc=paulus@samba$(echo .)org \
    --cc=scottwood@freescale$(echo .)com \
    --cc=srikar@linux$(echo .)vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=sukadev@linux$(echo .)vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=warrier@linux$(echo .)vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox