public inbox for linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel•crashing.org>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux•intel.com>,
	Holger Brunck <holger.brunck@keymile•com>,
	"linuxppc-dev@lists•ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@lists•ozlabs.org>
Cc: "mingo@kernel•org" <mingo@kernel•org>
Subject: Re: debug problems on ppc 83xx target due to changed struct task_struct
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 08:13:52 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1471385632.19495.24.camel@kernel.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57B1EBAE.6030503@linux.intel.com>

On Mon, 2016-08-15 at 09:19 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> 
> Wow, thanks for all the debugging here!

Yup, thanks, that's really odd... I wonder if one of those
structures is accessed beyond it's boundary, either the sigset
or the thread struct, causing corruption of neighbouring fields
in task struct...

Can you try adding a little canary on both sides (make it not-so-little 
maybe a few words) which you initialize to a known pattern and check
every now and then ?

> So, we know it has to do with signals, thread_info, and probably only
> affects 32-bit powerpc.  Seems awfully weird.  Have you checked with
> any
> of the 64-bit powerpc guys to see if they have any ideas?
> 
> I went grepping around for a bit.
> 
> Where is the task_struct stored?  Is it on-stack on ppc32 or
> something?

No it's allocated normally.

>  The thread_info is,

Yes, thread_info is at the bottom of stack

>  I assume, but I see some THREAD_INFO vs. THREAD
> (thread struct) math happening in here, which confuses me:
>  
>         .globl  ret_from_debug_exc
> ret_from_debug_exc:
>         mfspr   r9,SPRN_SPRG_THREAD
>         lwz     r10,SAVED_KSP_LIMIT(r1)
>         stw     r10,KSP_LIMIT(r9)
>         lwz     r9,THREAD_INFO-THREAD(r9)

This calculates the offset between the thread struct and the pointer
to thread info inside task struct and loads that pointer into r9

>         CURRENT_THREAD_INFO(r10, r1)
>         lwz     r10,TI_PREEMPT(r10)
>         stw     r10,TI_PREEMPT(r9)
>         RESTORE_xSRR(SRR0,SRR1);
>         RESTORE_xSRR(CSRR0,CSRR1);
>         RESTORE_MMU_REGS;
>         RET_FROM_EXC_LEVEL(SPRN_DSRR0, SPRN_DSRR1, PPC_RFDI)

Basically the above code transfers TI_PREEMPT from the "current"
thread info which I believe would be on some exception/interrupt
stack into the current task thread info.

> But, I'm really at a loss to explain this.  It still seems like a
> deeply
> ppc-specific issue.  We can obviously work around it with an #ifdef
> for
> your platform, but that's awfully hackish and hides the real bug,
> whatever it is.
> 
> My suspicion is that there's a bug in the 32-bit ppc assembly
> somewhere.
>  I don't see any references to 'blocked' or 'real_blocked' in
> assembly
> though.  You could add a bunch of padding instead of moving the
> thread_struct and see if that does anything, but that's really a stab
> in
> the dark.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-08-16 22:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-12 14:50 debug problems on ppc 83xx target due to changed struct task_struct Holger Brunck
2016-08-12 15:14 ` Dave Hansen
2016-08-12 15:47   ` Holger Brunck
2016-08-12 16:09     ` Dave Hansen
2016-08-15 14:35       ` Holger Brunck
2016-08-15 16:19         ` Dave Hansen
2016-08-16 17:27           ` christophe leroy
2016-08-16 17:36             ` Dave Hansen
2016-08-17  8:22               ` Christophe Leroy
2016-08-17 15:27             ` Holger Brunck
2016-08-18  8:23               ` Christophe Leroy
2016-08-19 11:03               ` Christophe Leroy
2016-08-19 11:14                 ` Holger Brunck
2016-08-19 13:44                   ` Christophe Leroy
2016-08-19 16:26                     ` Holger Brunck
2016-08-16 22:13           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2016-08-17 15:05             ` Holger Brunck
2016-08-17 14:59           ` Holger Brunck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1471385632.19495.24.camel@kernel.crashing.org \
    --to=benh@kernel$(echo .)crashing.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux$(echo .)intel.com \
    --cc=holger.brunck@keymile$(echo .)com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists$(echo .)ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel$(echo .)org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox