Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/35] treewide trivial patches converting pr_warning to pr_warn

From: Joe Perches <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 09:18:24 -0800

On Thu, 2017-02-23 at 09:28 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 1:11 AM, Joe Perches <[email-masked]> wrote:
> > There are ~4300 uses of pr_warn and ~250 uses of the older
> > pr_warning in the kernel source tree.
> > 
> > Make the use of pr_warn consistent across all kernel files.
> > 
> > This excludes all files in tools/ as there is a separate
> > define pr_warning for that directory tree and pr_warn is
> > not used in tools/.
> > 
> > Done with 'sed s/\bpr_warning\b/pr_warn/' and some emacsing.
[]
> Where's the removal of pr_warning so we don't have more sneak in?

After all of these actually get applied,
and maybe a cycle or two later, one would
get sent.