public inbox for linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@linuxcare•com.au>
To: Dan Malek <dan@mvista•com>
Cc: Gabriel Paubert <paubert@iram•es>,
	tom_gall@vnet•ibm.com, Tom Gall <tgall@rochcivictheatre•org>,
	Troy Benjegerdes <hozer@drgw•net>,
	linuxppc-commit@hq•fsmlabs.com,
	linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists•linuxppc.org>
Subject: Re: context overflow
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 21:55:29 +1100 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <14975.55329.292764.981333@tango.linuxcare.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3A6DCBBE.60AB54CE@mvista.com>


Dan Malek writes:

> Heh :-)....Right, but it will require a context, and active_mm is
> the proper place to store/retrieve it.  Doesn't the HIGHMEM option
> require we properly use a kernel context?  Or, do we just get lucky
> there, too :-).

The way we do things on 6xx/7xx, kernel accesses to addresses >=
0xc0000000 don't depend on active_mm or on the currently selected
context at all.  We can effectively choose a different context for
each 256MB segment of the address space, and we always choose context
0 for segments 0xc to 0xf.  Further, the hash_page routine looks in
swapper_pg_dir for linux PTEs for addresses >= 0xc0000000, rather than
in the page tables associated with current->active_mm or current->mm.

--
Paul Mackerras, Open Source Research Fellow, Linuxcare, Inc.
+61 2 6262 8990 tel, +61 2 6262 8991 fax
paulus@linuxcare•com.au, http://www.linuxcare.com.au/
Linuxcare.  Putting Open Source to work.

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2001-02-06 10:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-01-20  2:27 context overflow Dan Malek
2001-01-22  4:28 ` Troy Benjegerdes
2001-01-22  4:39   ` Tom Gall
2001-01-22 18:10     ` Dan Malek
2001-01-22 18:55     ` tom_gall
2001-01-22 19:59       ` Dan Malek
2001-01-22 22:08         ` tom_gall
2001-01-23  0:10           ` Dan Malek
2001-01-23 10:00             ` Gabriel Paubert
2001-01-23 18:21               ` Dan Malek
2001-02-06 10:55                 ` Paul Mackerras [this message]
2001-02-06 21:11                   ` Dan Malek
2001-02-06 21:50                     ` Paul Mackerras
2001-02-06 22:29                       ` Dan Malek
2001-02-06 22:45                         ` Paul Mackerras
2001-02-06 10:50               ` Paul Mackerras
2001-02-06 21:32                 ` Dan Malek
2001-02-06 22:08                   ` Paul Mackerras
2001-02-06 23:14                     ` Dan Malek
2001-02-07  0:23                       ` Paul Mackerras
2001-02-07 18:02                         ` Dan Malek
2001-02-08  0:48                           ` Paul Mackerras
2001-02-08  1:39                             ` Frank Rowand
2001-02-08 19:00                             ` David Edelsohn
2001-02-08 20:53                               ` Roman Zippel
2001-02-08 21:14                                 ` David Edelsohn
2001-02-08 23:23                                   ` Roman Zippel
2001-02-08 23:48                                     ` Cort Dougan
2001-02-08 21:28                               ` Cort Dougan
2001-02-08 22:08                                 ` David Edelsohn
2001-02-08 22:26                                   ` Cort Dougan
2001-02-08 23:17                                     ` David Edelsohn
2001-02-08 23:27                                       ` Cort Dougan
2001-02-08 23:28                                   ` Gabriel Paubert
2001-02-09  9:58                                     ` Paul Mackerras
2001-02-09 10:57                                       ` Gabriel Paubert
2001-02-09 11:26                                         ` Paul Mackerras
2001-02-09 10:49                               ` Paul Mackerras
2001-02-07  9:18                   ` Roman Zippel
2001-02-07 17:46                     ` Dan Malek
2001-02-07 18:39                       ` Roman Zippel
2001-02-07 21:16                         ` Gabriel Paubert
2001-02-08  0:34                           ` Paul Mackerras
2001-01-22  4:55   ` Larry McVoy
2001-01-22  6:15     ` Troy Benjegerdes
2001-01-23  1:12 ` Frank Rowand
2001-01-23  1:20   ` Dan Malek
2001-01-23  2:12     ` Frank Rowand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=14975.55329.292764.981333@tango.linuxcare.com.au \
    --to=paulus@linuxcare$(echo .)com.au \
    --cc=dan@mvista$(echo .)com \
    --cc=hozer@drgw$(echo .)net \
    --cc=linuxppc-commit@hq$(echo .)fsmlabs.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists$(echo .)linuxppc.org \
    --cc=paubert@iram$(echo .)es \
    --cc=tgall@rochcivictheatre$(echo .)org \
    --cc=tom_gall@vnet$(echo .)ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox