Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 11/12] ima: Define ima-modsig template

From: Mimi Zohar <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 09 May 2019 19:01:29 -0400

On Thu, 2019-04-18 at 00:51 -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> Define new "d-modsig" template field which holds the digest that is
> expected to match the one contained in the modsig, and also new "modsig"
> template field which holds the appended file signature.
> 
> Add a new "ima-modsig" defined template descriptor with the new fields as
> well as the ones from the "ima-sig" descriptor.
> 
> Change ima_store_measurement() to accept a struct modsig * argument so that
> it can be passed along to the templates via struct ima_event_data.
> 
> Suggested-by: Mimi Zohar <[email-masked]>
> Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <[email-masked]>

Thanks, Roberto.  Just some thoughts inline below.

Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <[email-masked]>

> ---

<snip>

> +/*
> + * Validating the appended signature included in the measurement list requires
> + * the file hash calculated without the appended signature (i.e., the 'd-modsig'
> + * field). Therefore, notify the user if they have the 'modsig' field but not
> + * the 'd-modsig' field in the template.
> + */
> +static void check_current_template_modsig(void)
> +{
> +#define MSG "template with 'modsig' field also needs 'd-modsig' field\n"
> +	struct ima_template_desc *template;
> +	bool has_modsig, has_dmodsig;
> +	static bool checked;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	/* We only need to notify the user once. */
> +	if (checked)
> +		return;
> +
> +	has_modsig = has_dmodsig = false;
> +	template = ima_template_desc_current();
> +	for (i = 0; i < template->num_fields; i++) {
> +		if (!strcmp(template->fields[i]->field_id, "modsig"))
> +			has_modsig = true;
> +		else if (!strcmp(template->fields[i]->field_id, "d-modsig"))
> +			has_dmodsig = true;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (has_modsig && !has_dmodsig)
> +		pr_notice(MSG);
> +
> +	checked = true;
> +#undef MSG
> +}
> +

There was some recent discussion about supporting per IMA policy rule
template formats.  This feature will allow just the kexec kernel image
to require ima-modsig.  When per policy rule template formats support
is upstreamed, this function will need to be updated.

<snip>
> 
> @@ -389,3 +425,25 @@ int ima_eventsig_init(struct ima_event_data *event_data,
>  	return ima_write_template_field_data(xattr_value, event_data->xattr_len,
>  					     DATA_FMT_HEX, field_data);
>  }
> +
> +int ima_eventmodsig_init(struct ima_event_data *event_data,
> +			 struct ima_field_data *field_data)
> +{
> +	const void *data;
> +	u32 data_len;
> +	int rc;
> +
> +	if (!event_data->modsig)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The xattr_value for IMA_MODSIG is a runtime structure containing
> +	 * pointers. Get its raw data instead.
> +	 */

"xattr_value"?  The comment needs some clarification.

Mimi

> +	rc = ima_modsig_serialize(event_data->modsig, &data, &data_len);
> +	if (rc)
> +		return rc;
> +
> +	return ima_write_template_field_data(data, data_len,
> +					     DATA_FMT_HEX, field_data);
> +}