From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <bh40@calva•net>
To: <linuxppc-dev@lists•linuxppc.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k•org>,
<paulus@linuxcare•com.au>
Subject: Re: __ioremap_at() in 2.4.0-test9-pre2
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2000 23:33:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19340823170445.20040@192.168.1.10> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19340823125112.7591@mailhost.mipsys.com>
Earlier today, I wrote:
>
>Then, we can have separate:
> - isa_io_remap(range),
> - isa_mem_remap(range),
> - pci_io_remap(pci_bus, resource_addr)
> - pci_mem_remap(pci_bus, resource_addr)
>
> .../...
>
Obviously this would be a long term plan and need more thinking and then
endless discussions on the linux-kernel list...
That's why I liked, as a temporary workaround, what Paul proposed which
was basically to have the kernel hack a MMU mapping that puts all IO
busses together, the first one beeing the default for legacy devices
(eventually selected via a kernel arg).
This way, inb/outb would work for legacy devices on this bus and for
normal PCI IO "apertures" by using resource[x]->start as a base (like all
PCI drivers currently do AFAIK)
We would have to fixup IO resources of all other IO busses, but I think
it's the less painful solution for 2.4.
Ben.
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-09-28 23:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-09-17 18:59 __ioremap_at() in 2.4.0-test9-pre2 Geert Uytterhoeven
2000-09-19 3:59 ` Paul Mackerras
2000-09-19 5:56 ` Michel Lanners
2000-09-19 14:28 ` Dan Malek
2000-09-19 18:31 ` Roman Zippel
2000-09-19 20:09 ` Dan Malek
2000-09-19 23:42 ` Roman Zippel
2000-09-20 0:10 ` Dan Malek
2000-09-20 17:18 ` Roman Zippel
2000-09-20 18:11 ` Dan Malek
2000-09-20 20:22 ` Roman Zippel
2000-09-20 20:41 ` David Edelsohn
2000-09-21 2:16 ` Dan Malek
2000-09-21 2:26 ` David Edelsohn
2000-09-21 2:40 ` Dan Malek
2000-09-21 3:53 ` David Edelsohn
2000-09-19 22:06 ` Matt Porter
2000-09-19 22:58 ` Paul Mackerras
2000-09-20 6:12 ` Matt Porter
2000-09-20 12:15 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2000-09-20 23:08 ` Paul Mackerras
2000-09-21 20:12 ` Matt Porter
2000-09-20 8:34 ` Roman Zippel
2000-09-20 22:54 ` Paul Mackerras
2000-09-20 15:56 ` Dan Malek
2000-09-20 23:22 ` Paul Mackerras
2000-09-21 2:13 ` Dan Malek
2000-09-21 2:35 ` Paul Mackerras
2000-09-21 3:57 ` Dan Malek
2000-09-21 5:06 ` Paul Mackerras
2000-09-21 6:51 ` Dan Malek
2000-09-21 14:03 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2000-09-21 22:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2000-09-22 3:53 ` Dan Malek
2000-09-22 11:58 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2000-09-22 18:46 ` Dan Malek
2000-09-22 20:06 ` Frank Rowand
2000-09-23 21:38 ` Matt Porter
2000-09-21 20:22 ` Matt Porter
2000-09-22 3:49 ` Paul Mackerras
2000-09-22 4:16 ` Dan Malek
2000-09-23 12:34 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2000-09-27 10:37 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2000-09-28 9:59 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2000-09-28 19:19 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2000-09-28 23:33 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2000-09-29 5:08 ` Dan Malek
2000-09-29 11:37 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2000-09-29 17:12 ` Kostas Gewrgiou
2000-09-29 17:18 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2000-09-29 21:35 ` Michel Lanners
2000-09-30 0:11 ` Matt Porter
2000-09-29 0:22 ` Paul Mackerras
2000-09-29 0:40 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2000-09-29 1:17 ` Paul Mackerras
2000-09-29 4:22 ` Dan Malek
2000-09-29 4:29 ` Dan Malek
2000-09-29 4:36 ` Paul Mackerras
2000-09-29 5:40 ` Dan Malek
2000-09-29 19:07 ` Frank Rowand
2000-09-30 1:39 ` Paul Mackerras
2000-09-30 22:50 ` Frank Rowand
2000-10-01 1:09 ` Dan Malek
2000-10-01 8:16 ` Paul Mackerras
2000-10-01 21:30 ` Dan Malek
2000-10-01 22:50 ` Paul Mackerras
2000-10-02 9:04 ` Dan Malek
2000-09-28 23:24 ` Frank Rowand
2000-09-21 13:44 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2000-09-21 22:41 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2000-09-22 21:59 ` Michel Lanners
2000-09-20 12:08 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2000-09-20 16:31 ` Matt Porter
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-09-21 7:30 Iain Sandoe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19340823170445.20040@192.168.1.10 \
--to=bh40@calva$(echo .)net \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k$(echo .)org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists$(echo .)linuxppc.org \
--cc=paulus@linuxcare$(echo .)com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox