public inbox for linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Rini <trini@kernel•crashing.org>
To: Michael Schmitz <schmitz@opal•biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k•org>,
	Thomas Graichen <graichen@innominate•de>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists•linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: openoffice on ppc anyone?
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 08:03:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20001019080331.H15104@opus.bloom.county> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10010190955320.28045-100000@opal.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>; from schmitz@opal.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de on Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 10:00:20AM +0200


On Thu, Oct 19, 2000 at 10:00:20AM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:

> > http://porting.openoffice.org/ implies anwyays the src for the tools should be
> > around.  Finally, gcc 2.95.2 (or 2.95.3) and glibc 2.1.3 are good for you.
> > JDK 1.2.2 should be fine (Kevin?)
>
> The day I tried (Oct. 13) nothing besides the raw source tarball was up on
> the site. I'll check again though. I've read to different and conflicting
> build instructions (one suggested JDK 1.1.8, the other 1.2.2).

Well, make sure to update your tree.  One of the mailing lists on that page
says some diffs for linux/ppc have been checked in.

> I'm already using a recent gcc 2.95.3 but libc upgrades always freak me
> out ...

It's not as bad as it used to be. :)

--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2000-10-19 15:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-10-17  5:23 openoffice on ppc anyone? Thomas Graichen
2000-10-17 19:06 ` Michael Schmitz
2000-10-18 11:17   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2000-10-18 20:08     ` Michael Schmitz
2000-10-19  0:20     ` Tom Rini
2000-10-19  8:00       ` Michael Schmitz
2000-10-19 15:03         ` Tom Rini [this message]
2000-10-19 15:11           ` Michael Schmitz
2000-10-19 16:02             ` Tom Rini
2000-10-19  1:06     ` William Blew
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-10-19 16:21 Kevin B. Hendricks
2000-10-19 17:47 ` Michael Schmitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20001019080331.H15104@opus.bloom.county \
    --to=trini@kernel$(echo .)crashing.org \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k$(echo .)org \
    --cc=graichen@innominate$(echo .)de \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists$(echo .)linuxppc.org \
    --cc=schmitz@opal$(echo .)biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox