Subject: Re: status of ppc support in official 2.4.0 or Alan's 2.4.0-ac1

From: Tom Rini <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 08:37:22 -0700

On Tue, Jan 09, 2001 at 12:07:03AM +0900, Kaoru Fukui wrote:
> From: Tom Rini <[email-masked]>
> To: [email-masked]
> Subject: Re: status of ppc support in official 2.4.0 or Alan's 2.4.0-ac1
> Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2001 10:42:47 -0700
>
>
> > Well, the first problem is that it's now linuxppc_2_4 (which isn't a rename,
> > it's a new tree) which needs all the fixes from 2_3, and some of the twitchy
> > stuff left out.  So it may or may not be possible to get a good 2.4 tree
> for
> > a bit (except for 2_5) anyways.
>
> What port number is bk linuxppc_2_4?
> May our user access this linuxppc_2_4?

2_4 is on the same port as where 2_3 used to be.  2_4 is once again working,
so everyone go and try that tree on your machine.

--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/