Subject: Re: Broken asm/div64.h macro

From: Tom Rini <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 17:37:20 -0700

On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 08:45:31PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 10:16:28AM +0200, Momchil Velikov wrote:
> > > >>>>> "Kaoru" == Kaoru Fukui <[email-masked]> writes:
> > >
> > > Kaoru> On 27 Jan, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
> > > >> Did you actually try compiling PPC this way??
> > > >>
> > > >> vsprintf.o(.text+0x494): undefined reference to `__umoddi3'
> > > >> vsprintf.o(.text+0x494): relocation truncated to fit: R_PPC_REL24
> > > >> __umoddi3
> > > >> vsprintf.o(.text+0x4ac): undefined reference to `__udivdi3'
> > > >> vsprintf.o(.text+0x4ac): relocation truncated to fit: R_PPC_REL24
> > > >> __udivdi3
> > >
> > > Kaoru> libgcc.a has those libraries.
> > >
> > > Yeah, but we don't link with libgcc.a. (which I forgot).
> >
> > Er, but isn't it (sort-of) considered a bug if the kernel links with
> > libgcc.a ?  I think the consensious on l-k would be yes.
>
> So you copy the code from the libgcc sources, cfr. arch/m68k/lib/.

Or optimize that, yes.  But linking directly is a no-no. :)

--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/