Subject: Re: 2.5 development

From: Tom Rini <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 11:50:16 -0700

On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 10:44:33AM -0800, Larry McVoy wrote:
> > These are related trees.  For 2.5.x all of the PPC trees are related to
> > the official Linus 2.5.x bk tree.  Something like:
> > linux-2.5 -> {for-linus-*, linuxppc-2.5}.
> > Since linuxppc-2.5 and for-linus-ppc are both children of linux-2.5,
> > shouldn't they be related?
>
> Yes, if they are all clones from the same original tree, they are all
> related.  The way to tell is to run "bk identity" in each tree, if that
> output is the same, you may pull between them.
>
> I thought Paul was talking about taking changes from the tree Cort created
> and putting it the tree Linus created.

Nope.  We're still using those for 2.2 and 2.4, but the official tree
for 2.5 (since it makes our lives easier too :))

So are out of order changesets on the horizon?

--
Tom Rini (TR1265)
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/