Subject: Re: EV-64260-BP & GT64260 bi_recs

From: [email-masked]
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 19:40:11 +0100

>Yeah, that's right, I messed up.  So what should be done for the nested ones?
>What is we use the BI_DEVICE as a quasi-BI_FIRST and then add a BI_LAST
>to each
>nested one?  This is what it would look like:

Any reason why BI_LAST has those 4 bytes of data set to 0, why not
just BI_LAST size=0 and no data ?

Ben.

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/