public inbox for linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew May <acmay@acmay•homeip.net>
To: Matt Porter <porter@cox•net>, linuxppc-embedded@lists•linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: very minor 405GP and 405GPr PCI difference
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 12:37:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021011193720.GA9039@acmay.homeip.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20021009015828.GO32555@zax>


Sorry about the late reply but I wanted to check the 2.5 tree and I haven't
been looking at it before.

On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 11:58:28AM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 10:21:36PM -0700, Andrew May wrote:
> >
> > A full featured bootloader like PPCboot will need to setup the PCI bus
> > to work with PCI devices, so it is not like it is always an extra burden
> > on the bootloader or useless work.
>
> That's all very well if you've got PPCboot, but lots of boards have
> firmware which is, lets face it, shite.  The kernel has to be able to
> deal with this case.  And since it has to deal with it for the case of
> crappy firmware, is there any point turning it off for the case of
> decent firmware?

Yes there is a point. I am working on a new custum PCI device and the
hardware guy gives me silly requests to try differnt PCI bus settings.
And I would much rather make the changes in my small quick PPCBoot build
rather than a full kernel build.

> > So I just want you to keep in mind the PCI bus fixup can be a config
> > option that can be built out if desired. It really shouldn't be tied
> > to the board itself, since it is also common to load in PPCboot into
> > Walnut boards.
>
> That's easy - in fact the patch I posted before allows this (it won't
> do anything if CONFIG_BIOS_FIXUP is not defined).

Well you patch is only part of the issue, it is the rest of
arch/ppc/kernel/4xx/ppc405_pci.c that gets pulled in every build with PCI,
that remapps everything in _find_bridges.

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-10-11 19:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-09-27 12:27 very minor 405GP and 405GPr PCI difference Ralph Blach
2002-09-30  4:01 ` David Gibson
2002-10-01  5:21   ` David Gibson
2002-10-01  8:37     ` "David Müller (ELSOFT AG)"
2002-10-02  1:42       ` David Gibson
2002-10-02  4:26         ` Allen Curtis
2002-10-02  5:34           ` David Gibson
2002-10-02 17:03             ` Matt Porter
2002-10-03  1:10               ` David Gibson
2002-10-03 15:14                 ` Matt Porter
2002-10-04  2:48                   ` David Gibson
2002-10-04 18:33                     ` Todd Poynor
2002-10-08  4:17                       ` David Gibson
2002-10-08 19:39                         ` Todd Poynor
2002-10-09  2:14                           ` David Gibson
     [not found]                           ` <20021 <20021023040850.GC1198@zax>
2002-10-24 23:50                             ` Ralph Blach
2002-10-25  1:19                               ` David Gibson
2002-10-02  7:46         ` "David Müller (ELSOFT AG)"
2002-10-03  1:12           ` David Gibson
2002-10-03  8:28             ` "David Müller (ELSOFT AG)"
2002-10-06  5:23             ` Andrew May
2002-10-07  1:31               ` Matt Porter
2002-10-08  4:14                 ` David Gibson
2002-10-08  5:21                   ` Andrew May
2002-10-08 14:56                     ` Matt Porter
2002-10-08 17:31                       ` Andrew May
2002-10-08 18:20                         ` Matt Porter
2002-10-09  1:58                     ` David Gibson
2002-10-09 10:35                       ` Kenneth Johansson
2002-10-09 15:21                         ` Allen Curtis
2002-10-11 19:37                       ` Andrew May [this message]
2002-10-14  1:20                         ` David Gibson
2002-10-08  6:19                   ` Allen Curtis
2002-10-08 15:18                     ` Matt Porter
2002-10-09  2:10                     ` David Gibson
2002-10-22 21:55         ` Todd Poynor
2002-10-23  4:08           ` David Gibson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-23 13:10 Ralph Blach

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20021011193720.GA9039@acmay.homeip.net \
    --to=acmay@acmay$(echo .)homeip.net \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists$(echo .)linuxppc.org \
    --cc=porter@cox$(echo .)net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox