From: "anu k" <anuk_mv@rediffmail•com>
To: linuxppc-embedded@lists•linuxppc.org
Subject: Problem with EEPro100 and Sandpoint board
Date: 14 Aug 2003 19:08:19 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030814190819.31581.qmail@webmail35.rediffmail.com> (raw)
Hi,
I am using an EEpro100 driver with a Sandpoint X3 board and am running into problems with BooTP.
Serial driver version 5.05c (2001-07-08) with MANY_PORTS SHARE_IRQ SERIAL_PCI enabled
ttyS00 at 0xfe0003f8 (irq = 4) is a 16550A
ttyS01 at 0xfe0002f8 (irq = 3) is a 16550A
block: 64 slots per queue, batch=16
RAMDISK driver initialized: 16 RAM disks of 4096K size 1024 blocksize
loop: loaded (max 8 devices)
eepro100.c: Debug level is 10.
eepro100.c:v1.09j-t 9/29/99 Donald Becker http://www.scyld.com/network/eepro100.html
eepro100.c: $Revision: 1.36 $ 2000/11/17 Modified by Andrey V. Savochkin <saw@saw•sw.com.sg> and others
Found Intel i82557 PCI Speedo, MMIO at 0xbffff000, IRQ 21.
eth0: PCI device 8086:1030, 00:00:82:58:50:02, IRQ 21.
Board assembly 742252-003, Physical connectors present: RJ45
Primary interface chip i82555 PHY #1.
General self-test: passed.
Serial sub-system self-test: passed.
Internal registers self-test: passed.
ROM checksum self-test: passed (0x8b51f404).
NET4: Linux TCP/IP 1.0 for NET4.0
IP Protocols: ICMP, UDP, TCP, IGMP
IP: routing cache hash table of 512 buckets, 4Kbytes
TCP: Hash tables configured (established 2048 bind 4096)
TCP: Hash tables configured (established 2048 bind 4096)
Sending BOOTP requests .<7>eth0: Link status change.
.<7>eth0: Media control tick, status 2050.
.<7>eth0: Media control tick, status 2050.
.<7>eth0: Media control tick, status a050.
.<7>eth0: Media control tick, status a050.
.<7>eth0: Media control tick, status a050.
timed out!
IP-Config: Retrying forever (NFS root)...
Sending BOOTP requests .<7>eth0: Link status change.
.<7>eth0: Media control tick, status 2050.
.
The BooTP server seems to be responding to the requests, but the packets are getting lost at the client end. Not quite sure if its a driver problem or has something to do with the new Sandpoint board revision.\x13
Regds,
Anuk
___________________________________________________
Meet your old school or college friends from
1 Million + database...
Click here to reunite www.batchmates.com/redif
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next reply other threads:[~2003-08-14 19:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-14 19:08 anu k [this message]
2003-08-14 22:35 ` Problem with EEPro100 and Sandpoint board Mark A. Greer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030814190819.31581.qmail@webmail35.rediffmail.com \
--to=anuk_mv@rediffmail$(echo .)com \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists$(echo .)linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox