Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use platform device for 8250 registration

From: Russell King <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 17:46:00 +0100

On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 05:39:30PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 12:11 +0100, Russell King wrote:
> > Doesn't PPC64 have NO_IRQ ?
> 
> PPC64 does but I find no definition of is_real_interrupt() other than
> the bogus one in 8250.c which checks for zero. PPC32 does not -- let's
> clean that one up separately.

Ok.  I'll give you this line now for this patch:

Acked-by: Russell King <[email-masked]>

so you're free to push it upstream whenever you deem is the right time.
Thanks.

-- 
Russell King