From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse•cz>
To: Akinobu Mita <mita@miraclelinux•com>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips•org, linux-ia64@vger•kernel.org,
Ian Molton <spyro@f2s•com>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse•de>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat•com>,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs•org, Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux•org>,
sparclinux@vger•kernel.org,
Miles Bader <uclinux-v850@lsi•nec.co.jp>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users•sourceforge.jp>,
Hirokazu Takata <takata@linux-m32r•org>,
linuxsh-dev@lists•sourceforge.net,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl•org>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic•park.msu.ru>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle•net>,
Chris Zankel <chris@zankel•net>,
dev-etrax@axis•com, ultralinux@vger•kernel.org,
linux-m68k@lists•linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@vger•kernel.org,
linuxsh-shmedia-dev@lists•sourceforge.net, linux390@de•ibm.com,
Russell King <rmk@arm•linux.org.uk>,
parisc-linux@parisc-linux•org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] {set,clear,test}_bit() related cleanup
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 17:14:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060126161426.GA1709@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060125112857.GB18584@miraclelinux.com>
Hi!
> While working on these patch set, I found several possible cleanup
> on x86-64 and ia64.
It is probably not your fault, but...
> Index: 2.6-git/include/asm-x86_64/mmu_context.h
> ===================================================================
> --- 2.6-git.orig/include/asm-x86_64/mmu_context.h 2006-01-25 19:07:15.000000000 +0900
> +++ 2.6-git/include/asm-x86_64/mmu_context.h 2006-01-25 19:13:59.000000000 +0900
> @@ -34,12 +34,12 @@
> unsigned cpu = smp_processor_id();
> if (likely(prev != next)) {
> /* stop flush ipis for the previous mm */
> - clear_bit(cpu, &prev->cpu_vm_mask);
> + cpu_clear(cpu, prev->cpu_vm_mask);
> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> write_pda(mmu_state, TLBSTATE_OK);
> write_pda(active_mm, next);
> #endif
> - set_bit(cpu, &next->cpu_vm_mask);
> + cpu_set(cpu, next->cpu_vm_mask);
> load_cr3(next->pgd);
>
> if (unlikely(next->context.ldt != prev->context.ldt))
cpu_set sounds *very* ambiguous. We have thing called cpusets, for
example. I'd not guess that is set_bit in cpu endianity (is it?).
Pavel
--
Thanks, Sharp!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-26 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-25 11:26 [PATCH 0/6] RFC: use include/asm-generic/bitops.h Akinobu Mita
2006-01-25 11:28 ` [PATCH 1/6] {set,clear,test}_bit() related cleanup Akinobu Mita
2006-01-26 16:14 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2006-01-26 16:47 ` Russell King
2006-01-26 19:14 ` Paul Jackson
2006-01-25 11:30 ` [PATCH 2/6] use non atomic operations for minix_*_bit() and ext2_*_bit() Akinobu Mita
2006-01-25 11:32 ` [PATCH 3/6] C-language equivalents of include/asm-*/bitops.h Akinobu Mita
2006-01-25 11:54 ` Keith Owens
2006-01-26 2:13 ` Akinobu Mita
2006-01-25 20:02 ` Russell King
2006-01-25 23:25 ` Ian Molton
2006-01-26 0:06 ` Richard Henderson
2006-01-26 4:34 ` Edgar Toernig
2006-01-26 17:30 ` Richard Henderson
2006-01-26 8:55 ` Russell King
2006-01-26 16:18 ` [parisc-linux] " Grant Grundler
2006-01-26 16:30 ` Nicolas Pitre
2006-01-26 16:40 ` Russell King
2006-01-26 23:04 ` Grant Grundler
2006-01-26 23:03 ` Russell King
2006-01-29 7:12 ` Stuart Brady
2006-01-30 4:03 ` David S. Miller
2006-01-30 17:06 ` Ralf Baechle
2006-01-30 19:50 ` Stuart Brady
2006-01-30 23:02 ` David S. Miller
2006-01-27 0:28 ` [parisc-linux] Re: [PATCH 3/6] C-language equivalents of John David Anglin
2006-01-27 12:51 ` [PATCH 3/6] C-language equivalents of include/asm-*/bitops.h Hirokazu Takata
2006-01-30 3:29 ` Akinobu Mita
2006-01-25 11:34 ` [PATCH 5/6] fix warning on test_ti_thread_flag() Akinobu Mita
2006-01-25 12:28 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2006-01-25 22:28 ` Paul Mackerras
2006-01-26 0:04 ` David S. Miller
2006-01-25 11:35 ` [PATCH 6/6] remove unused generic bitops in include/linux/bitops.h Akinobu Mita
[not found] ` <20060125113336.GE18584@miraclelinux.com>
2006-01-26 1:49 ` [PATCH 4/6] use include/asm-generic/bitops for each architecture Akinobu Mita
2006-01-27 13:04 ` Hirokazu Takata
2006-01-30 3:15 ` Akinobu Mita
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060126161426.GA1709@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@suse$(echo .)cz \
--cc=ak@suse$(echo .)de \
--cc=chris@zankel$(echo .)net \
--cc=dev-etrax@axis$(echo .)com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat$(echo .)com \
--cc=gerg@uclinux$(echo .)org \
--cc=ink@jurassic$(echo .)park.msu.ru \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@lists$(echo .)linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips$(echo .)org \
--cc=linux390@de$(echo .)ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs$(echo .)org \
--cc=linuxsh-dev@lists$(echo .)sourceforge.net \
--cc=linuxsh-shmedia-dev@lists$(echo .)sourceforge.net \
--cc=mita@miraclelinux$(echo .)com \
--cc=parisc-linux@parisc-linux$(echo .)org \
--cc=rmk@arm$(echo .)linux.org.uk \
--cc=rth@twiddle$(echo .)net \
--cc=sparclinux@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=spyro@f2s$(echo .)com \
--cc=takata@linux-m32r$(echo .)org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl$(echo .)org \
--cc=uclinux-v850@lsi$(echo .)nec.co.jp \
--cc=ultralinux@vger$(echo .)kernel.org \
--cc=ysato@users$(echo .)sourceforge.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox